No, can you put me in the picture?
No. I showed you a simple example that you don't understand .My premise was that prices can and do fall. Carman maintains a fall in price is not possible and that inflation is applied monthly.
carmanmemoranda said:
If something cost £100 in January.
£110 in Feb (10%)
£121 in March (10%)
£126 in april inflation has FALLEN to 5% but the price still went up
I don't think I can put it any simpler than that
Yes, but It's schoolboy stuff so I'm not going to bother.No, can you put me in the picture?
Yes. In the example I gave just substitute months for years.Isn't the inflation figure a PA figure, not monthly?
I clearly said, falling inflation still means rising prices
Yes. In the example I gave just substitute months for years.
The principle doesn't change
Yes, and the problem is?Not what you said, not what you said at all.
If something cost £100 in January.
£110 in Feb (10%)
£121 in March (10%)
£126 in april inflation has FALLEN to 5% but the price still went up
Yes, and the problem is?
Its an example, a very very very very basic example to ty to explain to you, and you still don't understand
I don't understand what they're riding on.???Yes, but It's schoolboy stuff so I'm not going to bother.
Falling inflation still means prices riding. Do you get that bit ?
You are still digging a holeInflation isn't compounded on a monthly basis, it's an annual measure. My link to the Bank of England a few posts back explains it.
I don't understand what you meanI don't understand what they're riding on.???
You are still digging a hole
If you can't see your hole, it really isn't my problemI'm quoting your nonsense, how is that digging a hole?
What you won't accept is that in a falling inflation scenario, prices can and are lower than the previous month
Please provide an example, using pounds and pence.