UK to Rwanda asylum plan ruled unlawful

There are two possible outcomes...

1. The government appeals, buggers about for months and achieves nothing, while allowing the country's hotels, converted cruise ships and airbases to fill up with a random assortment of the world's young men, which will result in the rich getting richer through cheap labour, while the poor get poorer and the country gets generally trashed. They should be able to keep the legal plates spinning until the next election, and will blame the nasty courts.

2. The government uses the UNCHR's objections as an excuse to leave it completely, which may have been their intention from the start, to allow them to further oppress the UK population and generally get away with whatever the hell they like.

I don't actually believe that the government's stated intention of stopping the boats is in any way honest, they've been lying about it for over a decade now while making the situation worse.

Labour aren't going to be any better. Kier Starmer, our likely next PM, will pretty much hand out passports on the beach, with the short term aim of reducing the immigration queues, which will result in a tidal wave of more following them. Many socialists have a stupid misguided idea that the world should be borderless so we can all care about everyone. We'll be looking back fondly on the good old days when net immigration was merely in the hundreds of thousands.

There isn't likely to be any good way out of this situation, for the simple reason that those in power from both our political parties actually want it all to continue.
 
Sponsored Links
There isn't likely to be any good way out of this situation, for the simple reason that those in power from both our political parties actually want it all to continue.

Tories want it to continue as to Labour - I doubt they will change the policy too much as the news media will be on them like a flash because they get to to determine the mood of the nation.

There are solutions but the tories and their media mates don't want them as they prefer the current situation.
 
An old article, but likely still valid:


The biggest cause of delay in removals of failed asylum seekers is bureaucratic, says Jerome Phelps, director of pressure group Detention Action. Many asylum seekers will have fled their countries without a valid travel document. Others may have destroyed their passport before entering the UK and it can be difficult to prove their nationality. Phelps argues that some people in this situation are "effectively unreturnable".

"The UK can want to kick people out and it can be lawfully authorised to do that but it requires the other country to actually want to take people back," says Brooks.


There are solutions

Such as?
 
Sponsored Links
An old article, but likely still valid:


The biggest cause of delay in removals of failed asylum seekers is bureaucratic, says Jerome Phelps, director of pressure group Detention Action. Many asylum seekers will have fled their countries without a valid travel document. Others may have destroyed their passport before entering the UK and it can be difficult to prove their nationality. Phelps argues that some people in this situation are "effectively unreturnable".

"The UK can want to kick people out and it can be lawfully authorised to do that but it requires the other country to actually want to take people back," says Brooks.




Such as?



We should look into a market based solution.

Currently there options are legal route which is overly complex or chance the illegal route. You can have an armada on our shores and it won't stop the people from trying to cross.
 
Easy one that, labour the international socialist party, so figuratively speaking it's in their remit to hand out passports on the beach.

lol, you are going to have to do better than that. Where is that stated as policy?
 
Oh no stop the boats is now no5 on the list.

His ears are massive.

5487d502-69b1-470a-9746-90a61e1b05aa.png
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top