Ukraine counter offensive

Sponsored Links
The Russian Covid jab is not much good.

Quite a lot of men of military age have died of "natural causes" over the last year. I can't think why that might be.

https___d6c748xw2pzm8.cloudfront.net_prod_393a0b10-b109-11ec-b258-7f7f21a62492-standard.png
 
It's distorted reporting. Putin has mentioned mobilising a 2m army. Not when or any other details.
That would take approximately every Russian man aged 18, 19 and 20

Or 50% of the men aged 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 and 23.

Not impossible, but would cause quite a stir. And some of them would run away.
 
Sponsored Links
That would take approximately every Russian man aged 18, 19 and 20

Or 50% of the men aged 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 and 23.

Not impossible, but would cause quite a stir. And some of them would run away.
The mobilisation is over a much wider range than that. They're able to recruit any former soldiers, which means most Russian adult males.
 
The mobilisation is over a much wider range than that. They're able to recruit any former soldiers, which means most Russian adult males.
And maybe a chunk from the Russia-created Stans, too.
Although, most of the Stans are doing better than they were, so, to Russia's annoyance, migrant workers have been going home.
 
Russia knows it has a problem with manpower, which is getting worse.

Who will keep the country going?




"Norma Cohen JUNE 24 2022
The writer is the FT’s former demography correspondent

"Despite the vast combat operation currently under way in Ukraine, the Kremlin has refrained from a full military mobilisation and refused to admit that it is at war. There are plenty of strategic reasons for this decision, but an underlying demographic weakness may also be partly to blame: Russia has been producing too few babies since the 1991 collapse of the Soviet Union to even keep its population stable, let alone build up an army...

The data for Russia indicates that its total fertility rate fell to about 1.3 babies per woman aged 15 to 44 in the early 1990s, according to the Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research. To maintain a stable population, the national average needs to be closer to 2.1 babies. Other nations falling below this threshold include China and several countries across central and eastern Europe, including Ukraine — which has barred men aged 18 to 60 from leaving the country since the invasion.

Moscow has tried to reverse the falling birth rate, including a policy in 2007 to offer financial rewards to those having children. But Dmitri Jdanov, head of Max Planck’s data lab, notes that while this produced a slight uptick in births, it mainly encouraged women to have a second child more quickly after the first was born.

Three years later, concerns were growing among Russia’s military leadership that low fertility was becoming a national security issue, with Lieutenant-General Vladimir Shamanov, then commander of airborne forces, proclaiming this a “great danger that we can no longer ignore”.

Shamanov’s fears are borne out in the data: while the number of men aged 18 to 27 is expected to grow sharply from severely depressed levels by 2035, the size of the slightly older cohort aged 30 to 35 will fall by 50 per cent over the same period, according to a study carried out on behalf of Finland’s Defence Research Agency.

Those of prime conscription age, 20 to 24, peaked in 2015 and began declining in 2020, the paper found. The manpower deficit will not be made any easier following the death of at least 15,000 Russian troops since the start of the Ukraine invasion."
 
Ah, Biden's latest package DOES include long distance versions of the Himars' ammo, among other things. Bet the Ukes will love those.
 
Ah, Biden's latest package DOES include long distance versions of the Himars' ammo, among other things. Bet the Ukes will love those.
they should give them a few thousand tomahawks, that would wipe out their navy and ground bases used for long range missiles.
 
Would they be able to claim asylum in this country?
Some countries are considering it, but most regard the draft as a civic duty and will not consider "draft dodging" as grounds for asylum.
 
Some countries are considering it, but most regard the draft as a civic duty and will not consider "draft dodging" as grounds for asylum.
How many would be conscientious objectors, d'you think?
I read the RoI, with a population of 5,000,000 has taken in 70,000 refugees from Ukraine while the UK, population 70,000,000, has recieved half that number. It seems we're not doing as much as the Tories say we are.
 
This is the case law for the uk

The short answer is even conscientious objection is not a ground for asylum. Unless
  • where the military service would involve acts, with which the individual may be associated, which are contrary to the basic rules of human conduct - this can include war crimes, crimes against humanity and grave human rights violations such as rape, torture or genocide
  • where the conditions of military service would be so harsh as to amount to persecution (for example, where they are at a risk of a threat to life (not exclusively in relation to combat), torture, security or freedom such as modern slavery, servitude, forced or compulsory labour and they have no viable opportunity to object)
  • where the punishment for draft evasion or desertion is disproportionately harsh or severe (for example, where prison conditions breach Article 3 of the ECHR (inhuman or degrading treatment) and they may face a real risk of torture or threat to life)

source https://assets.publishing.service.g...itary_Service_and_Conscientious_Objection.pdf
 
This is the case law for the uk

The short answer is even conscientious objection is not a ground for asylum. Unless
  • where the military service would involve acts, with which the individual may be associated, which are contrary to the basic rules of human conduct - this can include war crimes, crimes against humanity and grave human rights violations such as rape, torture or genocide
  • where the conditions of military service would be so harsh as to amount to persecution (for example, where they are at a risk of a threat to life (not exclusively in relation to combat), torture, security or freedom such as modern slavery, servitude, forced or compulsory labour and they have no viable opportunity to object)
  • where the punishment for draft evasion or desertion is disproportionately harsh or severe (for example, where prison conditions breach Article 3 of the ECHR (inhuman or degrading treatment) and they may face a real risk of torture or threat to life)

source https://assets.publishing.service.g...itary_Service_and_Conscientious_Objection.pdf
That would be any or all three based on media reports.

Blup
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top