- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 16,431
- Reaction score
- 2,322
- Country
No, but the meaning has. You should know this.The words approval, sign off, authorisation haven’t made it in to the act.
No, but the meaning has. You should know this.The words approval, sign off, authorisation haven’t made it in to the act.
More irrelevance.so if the two docs recorded their opinion in an email and confirmed it with each other that the abortion met the criteria, you reckon they, the team and the woman are all at risk of prosecution under the offences against person act. ?
Because they didn’t use the form HSA1?
What a load of tripe.
You mean a sign off from two doctors, like I've been informing you for the last two days?so if the two docs recorded their opinion in an email and confirmed it with each other that the abortion met the criteria,
No it hasn’t and it’s confirmed in all the guidelines, codes of conduct etc etc.No, but the meaning has. You should know this.
More irrelevance.So no HSA1. Vulnerable to prosecution yes or no?
Simple question.
And if their opinion is that the criteria aren't met?Simple question.
He doesn't answer questions. Probably lacks the knowledge.And if their opinion is that the criteria aren't met?
I think he has finally realised that it needs the sign off of two doctors before a woman in the UK can legally have an abortion. Its taken 600 posts and two days though.No, but the meaning has. You should know this.
No you don't, you are swerving.I know the answer. But we need an example.
The consent (sign off) of two doctors is relevant though. I'm sure there are other ways other than the HSA1 form (HSA2 for example), but they are semantics.The signature on a form is irrelevant.
Still clueless.Their assessment is entirely limited to the risks of the procedure and to determine if the pregnancy is beyond 24 weeks.
I’ve shown you the guidelines, the actual law (not glamour magazines version) and the NHS web page. None of it says you seek approval for the abortion and 2 doctors asses if your reason is valid. Their scope is entirely limited to the risk of the procedure, the time limit. and they are duty bound to act in good faith.
It’s a different legal system. Making something a constitutional statute doesn’t change the ability of a government to amend it. In the U.K.