Vive La France!

Their assessment is entirely limited to the risks of the procedure and to determine if the pregnancy is beyond 24 weeks.
Section 1 (2) of the Abortion Act, which states that doctors may take account of the pregnant woman’s actual or reasonably foreseeable environment when making a decision about the impact of the continuance of a pregnancy on a woman’s health. Here again, the law bestows upon doctors a gatekeeping role in terms of deciding who may have an abortion, but within that role provides for a great deal of latitude in making their decision. The law does not state that doctors ‘must’ take account of a woman’s environment, but that they ‘may’ do so. There is an implicit recognition that it is not always possible to separate the mental or physical health effects of abortion from a woman’s wider social circumstances - such as her income, her housing situation, her support network. Doctors may take all this into account in determining whether to authorise an abortion
 
Sponsored Links
What do solicitors know eh,

"Abortions can take place in the first 24 weeks of pregnancy in England, Scotland and Wales. When considering an abortion within the first 24 weeks of pregnancy, two doctors must approve the abortion."

 
You are just being petty for the sake of it.
Correct. The abortion is no longer legal unless the two doc's sign and date the HSA1 form. After this then the abortion is approved or authorised.

He's being a dick, because he cant see the word in the act. The important stuff is there though.....

Form HSA1 must be completed, signed and dated by two RMPs before an abortion is performed2. The HSA1 form must be kept with the patient notes for 3 years from the date of termination3. The form must be completed by both RMPs certifying theiropinion, formed in good faith that at least one and the same ground for abortion in section 1(1) of the Abortion Act exists4. The certification takes place in the light of their clinical opinion of the circumstances of the pregnant woman’s individual case. The lawful grounds for abortion are set out in Annex A
 
Last edited:
Sponsored Links
To demonstrate that an opinion has been formed “in good faith” does not require that the authorisation of an abortion be the right course of action, simply that the doctor has not been dishonest or negligent in forming the opinion.

Agree Yes/No

There is no legal requirement for either doctor to personally examine a woman seeking termination.

Agree Yes/No

What do you mean by “right course of action”?

Medical?
Legal?
Moral?
 
"The Abortion Act 1967 requires two doctors to approve the decision and that at least one of seven legal criteria is met in order for the abortion to be legal"

 
Section 1 (2) of the Abortion Act, which states that doctors may take account of the pregnant woman’s actual or reasonably foreseeable environment when making a decision about the impact of the continuance of a pregnancy on a woman’s health. Here again, the law bestows upon doctors a gatekeeping role in terms of deciding who may have an abortion, but within that role provides for a great deal of latitude in making their decision. The law does not state that doctors ‘must’ take account of a woman’s environment, but that they ‘may’ do so. There is an implicit recognition that it is not always possible to separate the mental or physical health effects of abortion from a woman’s wider social circumstances - such as her income, her housing situation, her support network. Doctors may take all this into account in determining whether to authorise an abortion

Your added commentary is not in the act.
 
You lot seem to be going far and wide to find text to support your arguments that aren’t in the abortion act.

I wonder why.
 
You lot seem to be going far and wide to find text to support your arguments that aren’t in the abortion act.
The meaning of the act is clear. Call it anything you like but approval/sign off/authorisation of 2 doctors is clearly a requirement.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top