Was Thatcher reallly that bad ?

No I'm not a copper. My "story" hasn't changed. :LOL:

hahahahaha thats funny. I just cottoned on to the 'gist'.
:LOL:
Sacked copper was what you should have said .

Funny thing is though-- most coppers when snido was 'on the beat' lived in coppers houses. All front doors Blue.
But- when lots of them got sacked /kicked out- they were too old to buy a house -so they rented --just like snido does today..

It really is a fact .

But-- 'hey ho' aint that what makes life go around ?.
 
Sponsored Links
No I'm not a copper. My "story" hasn't changed. :LOL:

hahahahaha thats funny. I just cottoned on to the 'gist'.
:LOL:
Sacked copper was what you should have said .

Funny thing is though-- most coppers when snido was 'on the beat' lived in coppers houses. All front doors Blue.
But- when lots of them got sacked /kicked out- they were too old to buy a house -so they rented --just like snido does today..

It really is a fact .

But-- 'hey ho' aint that what makes life go around ?.

You are the strangest person on this forum, by a long long way!!!!

Everything you assume about me is so far off the truth :LOL: :LOL:

But we ALL know what you are like dont we :rolleyes:
 
Norcon wrote

So you provide free housing where peoples only interest is to breed like rabbits and live off the tax payer all their lives?
The welfare bill in this country stands at around 200 billion per year.
Where will it end?

Are you going to break that figure down then?

The actual figure is £167 billion, amost £75bn pays for state pensions, Almost £50bn goes to servicing the debts.

Its very easy to manipulate figures :rolleyes:

Just as you have done.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AonYZs4MzlZbdHNXNW4yTlNMZllOZmRSOTRWTDNwWXc#gid=11

I prefer to believe its closer to 200 billion as I don't trust government figures anyway.
And then there's still your 50 billion to service the debts. :rolleyes:

Numbers were never a coppers strong point. :LOL:
 
I should not dignify your post with a reply. However I must/wish to reply to your comments.
Nope --I am not strange.
I just do not happen to allow myself be bullied by your and your fellow thugs putting 'latent' pressure on me.

You constantly insult me --and thats ok- no skin off a ducks back at all.

Centre of attention comes to mind- for you and your gang.
You all take it in turns to goad me . I dont mind that also.
In fact- you can say what you want and cast aspersions in every way possible. I dont give a fig.

I do however- object to you ruining threads with uninformed garbage that you continually spout out --for the sake of 'self glorification'.

Strange thing is though- that the nasty people you associate with - all come from the same part of the country . innit ?

Now- please dont contact me again.
 
Sponsored Links
I should not dignify your post with a reply. However I must/wish to reply to your comments.
Nope --I am not strange.
I just do not happen to allow myself be bullied by your and your fellow thugs putting 'latent' pressure on me.

You constantly insult me --and thats ok- no skin off a ducks back at all.

Centre of attention comes to mind- for you and your gang.
You all take it in turns to goad me . I dont mind that also.
In fact- you can say what you want and cast aspersions in every way possible. I dont give a fig.

I do however- object to you ruining threads with uninformed garbage that you continually spout out --for the sake of 'self glorification'.

Strange thing is though- that the nasty people you associate with - all come from the same part of the country . innit ?

Now- please dont contact me again.

That would be easy, if you done everyone on this forum a favour and deleted your account?

You have been caught out so many times now telling lies, you sure you aint a politician?
 
Now- please dont contact me again.[/quote]

Obviously- you dont understand or cant read.

PLEASE DONT CONTACT ME AGAIN.

end of .
 
I should not dignify your post with a reply.
Dont then.
However I must/wish to reply to your comments.
Nope --I am not strange.
No, you are not. Your a liar, belligerent, hateful, nasty, and worst of all weak. Who on earth asks mods to back their corner. This is from you PP - a real tough guy!
I just do not happen to allow myself be bullied by your and your fellow thugs putting 'latent' pressure on me.
Its blatent pressure by me for you to tell the truth or back it up. I asked in another thread for you to send me a postcard from Mexico or wherever the hell you were this month. You sarcastially asked me for an address. I have one, so when do I see this postcard?
You constantly insult me --and thats ok- no skin off a ducks back at all.
I prefer 'Water off a ducks back' - Im a plumber through and through me.
Centre of attention comes to mind- for you and your gang.
You all take it in turns to goad me . I dont mind that also.
In fact- you can say what you want and cast aspersions in every way possible. I dont give a flying fuck.
See, we can all lie Peter.
I do however- object to you ruining threads with uninformed garbage that you continually spout out --for the sake of 'self glorification'.

Strange thing is though- that the nasty people you associate with - all come from the same part of the country . innit ?

Now- please dont contact me again.

Yes, I can guarantee I'll never reply to you again, but Im sure you will to me, as you always have to have the last word.

EDIT:Ohh, pp, you've compained to the mods privately already.... Shall I delete my own post for you? No-one is contacting you by the way - merely discussing stuff with you in...erm... general discussion.
 
The reason has been eliminated

Really, so why are developers still sitting on landbanks?

Why do small developments get refused permission on a weekly basis because of nimbys.

etc.

it makes no sense selling off the social housing without building new housing

Why, the houses do not disappear?

if the population is increasing then more housing is the answer not less

1980 - 20 million homes
2012 - 27 million homes

Population increased from 55-62 (7 million).

Start getting it into your head that social housing is social housing, not *housing*, the need for social housing is a failure, not a solution.
 
ok i am not very good at picking several quotes from one thread into one post so bare with me :eek:

you sell off housing stock it becomes part off the private sector so the cost to rent is greater than if a housing association owns it so no control over how much it costs to maintain with the higher associated cost to the housing department


trying to demonise hard working families with comments about popping out sprogs or what ever it was is pointless as most people have the family they can afford

i personally had my son ok it was my ex wife but i couldn't afford 2 kids and a mortgage on my wages so there i stopped but we need to remember many a person will be very happily employed for several years and have only kids they can afford but are you possibly suggesting we should restrict out breading to cover any eventuality if thats the case no one would have any kids incase they where made redundant :eek:
and before you have a dig at me please remember i am trying to be as honest and factual as i can be even iff the information i link to or mention is contrary to my views ;)

and the comment about they chose those jobs with low wages or similar
a wee bit condescending not everybody has the choice skills or the luck to get close to the average wage
 
trying to demonise hard working families with comments about popping out sprogs or what ever it was is pointless as most people have the family they can afford

A hard working family is one thing.
The sprog popping for profit families completely another.
 
trying to demonise hard working families with comments about popping out sprogs or what ever it was is pointless as most people have the family they can afford

A hard working family is one thing.
The sprog popping for profit families completely another.

i think we have to think its the system that is broke where people think "this is the system and here is how we get the points we need "
yes people will do what they have to and yes it can be galling but they are given little option
 
A hard working family should be rewarded i think, and the skivers penalized, but that is common sense, so probably never happen.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top