Well Johnson

[martygturner]

Johnson was many things but he can't be accused of being part of the establishment, he had to go.

You mean Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson is not part of the establishment...

Educated at Eaton, then Bailey college at Oxford with membership of the Bullingdon club...you know that elite club George Osborne, David Camamoron, Edward VIII...etc etc

But live in your fantasy world...

 

[noseall]

This is Sunak on Dec 7th 2021 being quizzed in Parliament on whether or not he attended any parties. He categorically states that he did not. Four months later he received an FPN for attending parties.
Nothing will be done about this, despite the evidence there for everyone to see, no action will be taken because this man has been chosen by 'the establishment' to lead the country.
Clowns like 'you lot' can't do a thing about it because it's been decided by the establishment.

Starmer was caught by camera engaged in drinking and curry eating with company, not observing social distancing, the evidence is there for all to see, he even lied about on a number of occasions denying Rayner was present, only admitting she was after further devidence was produced.
No action was taken nor will it be because 'the establishment' have chosen him to be the leader of the opposition.

If Sunak (establishment choice) loses the next election Starmer (establishment choice) will become leader.
Clowns like 'you lot' can't do a thing about because that's what 'the establishment' have chosen.

Johnson is finished in Parliament for the moment because that's what the establishment have chosen, 'clowns like me and you lot' cant do a thing about it because that's what the establishment have chosen.

The MSN will be relentless in pursuing Johnson, they're pursuing him now over his new part time job because he didn't seek permission within the required timescale, they'll pursue him over all sorts forever and clowns like 'you lot' will lap it up because you are all establishment lap dogs.

Johnson was many things but he can't be accused of being part of the establishment, he had to go.

Blah...blah...blah.

You can bring up the behaviour of every MP in the history of UK politics (seems that you already are), but it won't change a thing regards the political crimes of devious, traitorous, lying scum, failed PM, Boris.

Seriously, you need to stop. Now. You are looking like a despairing nutter.

Just a thought.... Boris isn't your love child or summat?

 

[JohnD]

Johnson was many things but he can't be accused of being part of the establishment

Bow Locks.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

If he isn't part of the establishment, try and explain who is.

Talk about so blind that you cant even see what's staring you in your eyes.

 

[charliegolf]

You mean Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson is not part of the establishment...

Educated at Eaton, then Bailey college at Oxford with membership of the Bullingdon club...you know that elite club George Osborne, David Camamoron, Edward VIII...etc etc

But live in your fantasy world...

He even bitched at Oxford when they decided (on the basis of 2 years work and his exams) to only give him a 2:1 degree.

 

[JohnD]

He even bitched at Oxford when they decided (on the basis of 2 years work and his exams) to only give him a 2:1 degree.

Some say that's the first reason he resented Cameron, who got a first.

 

[Brigadier]

Bow Locks.

View attachment 306179

I don't think I'd ever get tired of slapping those entitled tw@ts.

 

[noseall]

I don't think I'd ever get tired of slapping those entitled tw@ts.

Imagine your bar being set so low, that not only are you a fan, but you publicly smoke their horn.

 

[Nige F]

Boris let himself down again in the photo - his trousers were too short. Bad Show. Did they call him "de Piffle" ? one wonders.

 

[Brigadier]

Imagine your bar being set so low, that not only are you a fan, but you publicly smoke their horn.

 

[fillyboy]

Last post 6.38pm, are the 'establishment fanboys' running out of steam already? Come on boys, try a little harder, even better, let's see who can put up some form of counter debate without throwing insults, you can't do it can you?

The 'establishment' love you guys, 'useful idiots' is I believe the term.

 

[Notch7]

This is Sunak on Dec 7th 2021 being quizzed in Parliament on whether or not he attended any parties. He categorically states that he did not. Four months later he received an FPN for attending parties.
Nothing will be done about this, despite the evidence there for everyone to see, no action will be taken because this man has been chosen by 'the establishment' to lead the country.
Clowns like 'you lot' can't do a thing about it because it's been decided by the establishment.

Starmer was caught by camera engaged in drinking and curry eating with company, not observing social distancing, the evidence is there for all to see, he even lied about on a number of occasions denying Rayner was present, only admitting she was after further devidence was produced.
No action was taken nor will it be because 'the establishment' have chosen him to be the leader of the opposition.

If Sunak (establishment choice) loses the next election Starmer (establishment choice) will become leader.
Clowns like 'you lot' can't do a thing about because that's what 'the establishment' have chosen.

Johnson is finished in Parliament for the moment because that's what the establishment have chosen, 'clowns like me and you lot' cant do a thing about it because that's what the establishment have chosen.

The MSN will be relentless in pursuing Johnson, they're pursuing him now over his new part time job because he didn't seek permission within the required timescale, they'll pursue him over all sorts forever and clowns like 'you lot' will lap it up because you are all establishment lap dogs.

Johnson was many things but he can't be accused of being part of the establishment, he had to go.

So what

the privileges committees purpose was to find out whether Johnson lied to parliament.

he did.
The End

 

[fillyboy]

So what

the privileges committees purpose was to find out whether Johnson lied to parliament.

he did.
The End

As amended from 'intentionally' lied to Parliament.

He didn't.
The End.

 

[JonathanM]

This is Sunak on Dec 7th 2021 being quizzed in Parliament on whether or not he attended any parties. He categorically states that he did not. Four months later he received an FPN for attending parties.
Nothing will be done about this, despite the evidence there for everyone to see, no action will be taken because this man has been chosen by 'the establishment' to lead the country.

The Starmer thing has been debated to death on here, so I'm not going to go over that again.

As regards that clip of Sunak, surely he would just say that it wasn't a "party".

As far as I can work out, the intentionality thing was a three stage process. First of all the committee would decide whether Johnson lied to Parliament. Then they would decide if that lying was a contempt of Parliament. If it was a contempt, they would decide whether the lying was inadvertent, reckless or intentional. If it was inadvertent, then they would not recommend a sanction. If it was reckless or intentional they would recommend a sanction. How different is that to previous cases? It seems an entirely sensible process to me. What are you saying was amended?

 

[fillyboy]

As regards that clip of Sunak, surely he would just say that it wasn't a "party".

He didn't say 'it wasn't a party', he said 'I didn't attend any parties'. This was in parliament, in other words, he lied to the house and has since made no attempt at a correction to his comments.
He is guilty of the same crime as Johnson but no action has been taken, nor will it be and 'stooges' like yourself will happily accept this because you're oh so happy Johnson has been deposed. Fair enough, I hope you're happy with whoever the 'establishment' chooses as your next leader.

For one moment, put aside your hatred for Johnson, I do understand he's a devisive character, I like him, others don't.

Ask yourself this, after 'misleading' parliament he was forced out of being PM and reduced to the back benches. Fair enough. After that the 'establishment' went on to drive him from Parliament completely. A ten day suspension was expected, enough to force a by election, some savvy commentators suggested a nine day suspension would have been a sensible move, chastising him but not forcing a by election. 90 days and suspension and cancelling his parliamentary pass? **** off, that's just being mental, OK, he called the kangaroo court a kangaroo court, can anyone in their right mind deny that's not the case.

Listen, that kangaroo court has issued itself the power to issue sanctions against any MP who calls it a kangaroo court, and have stated the intention of investigating MP's who have previously called it a kangaroo court. The senior member of the kangaroo court below Commissar Harman has been proven to hold a drinks and birthday cake event for his wifes birthday, during lockdown. Nothing is being done about it, and likely wont be.

Well done chaps, crack on, do as you're told there's a good boy.