What has tenant done to the electrics?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Maybe took the cannabis growing equipment out?
Do you mean the one where they use lights or fans, ducts, shiny metallic sheets and stuff like that and probably plants? Then no, because he's been there only for 15 months and I have done 2 inspections in the last 6 months with photos . There's smell of cigarettes, that's about it.
 
Last edited:
I just called DNO, they will book a date to sort it. They also asked a photo to email which I did.
 
How did they insert the black wire? Push fit?

I was talking to my electrician, said could be dangerous to pull it out, may cause spark or even explode, don't know?
 
Talking about ionisation, View attachment 376206 also called arc flash, want no current flowing and full PPE before touching.
Could check the current is zero with clamp-on.
the place would have been without any electricity, which would have resulted in some questions :)
From whom? If there are other users on the 100 amp fuse, was the tenant paying for their power? If not, no reason not to take the link out as he left It all seems rather odd.
 
From whom?
Well, for a start, from the OP/landlord when he was trying to interest a potential new tenant in a property which had no electricity :)
If there are other users on the 100 amp fuse, was the tenant paying for their power?
We've seen no evidence of anything which would enable the tenant to avoid paying for electricity
If not, no reason not to take the link out as he left It all seems rather odd.
As above, if the 'link' were there to bypass a blown fuse, then 'a reason' for not removing it would be that so doing would kill the electricity supply to the unit.
 
Well, for a start, from the OP/landlord when he was trying to interest a potential new tenant in a property which had no electricity :)
You don't think the new tenant would be put off by the link wire?
We've seen no evidence of anything which would enable the tenant to avoid paying for electricity
No, but if there were other users (which I thought, probably wrongly, you were suggesting), he might be paying for them as well.
As above, if the 'link' were there to bypass a blown fuse, then 'a reason' for not removing it would be that so doing would kill the electricity supply to the unit.
But if he's just leaving, so what? Maybe better to remove the wire and let the landlord discover the blown fuse, than to leave it there, giving evidence of hanky-panky.
 
You don't think the new tenant would be put off by the link wire?
With the cover back on (which I assume is how the old tenant left it) I very much doubt that a prospective new tenant would notice - but they probably would notice the absence of electricity :)
No, but if there were other users (which I thought, probably wrongly, you were suggesting), he might be paying for them as well.
I certainly wasn't suggesting that, and I'm not sure I understand your point. There is only one meter connected to that fuse, so I doubt that there are 'other users' (other than the tenant of the unit).
But if he's just leaving, so what? Maybe better to remove the wire and let the landlord discover the blown fuse, than to leave it there, giving evidence of hanky-panky.
Yes, maybe - but there are all sorts of possibilities. Indeed, if it had been there for some time, it's possible that he/she had just forgotten about the link - or, of course, that link may (behind a closed lid) even have pre-dated the recent tennant's tenancy!
 

DIYnot Local

Staff member

If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.

Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.


Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top