When considering in or out:

[Brigadier]

OK. I can accept that you see no relevance. Not really my problem.

You've got plenty enough already, DC.

 

[IWalkLikeHimaMartian]

You've got plenty enough already, DC.

News to me bragidear. But typical nonsensical argument, claim my comments are not relevant then switch the argument.
Very intelligent discussion tactics, bragidear.
It is you that appear to have problems, an inability to see relevance in anyone else's comments, coupled with an inability to hold a sensible discussion.
May I suggest you study my comments until you can comprehend them.
You could try another little exercise: gather a few words from random and try to string a sentence together using those words. It would probably be a more intelligent comment than your previous ones.

 

[Brigadier]

Go on then, educate me.

Explain how the second relates to the first.

Take as many words as you like.

 

[Brigadier]

Back to my question,

If the referendum was to be rerun one year from now, what would you Remainers do in say the three months before the vote, that was different to what you did in the three months before the referendum?

 

[IWalkLikeHimaMartian]

If the referendum were to be rerun a year on from today, what would YOU each do differently, between now and 31st March 2018?

If the referendum was to be rerun one year from now, what would you Remainers do in say the three months before the vote, that was different to what you did in the three months before the referendum?

Two different questions.
The first you are asking how would two optional futures differ.
The second question you are asking us to compare a past with a possible future.

Both questions are asking for possible scenarios on theoretical situations. The answer is blindingly obvious, the rerun referendum would be based on a different expected outcome.

 

[IWalkLikeHimaMartian]

One reacts to circumstances as they occur, rather than setting a predetermined course and sticking to it.
So how can one determine what action will be different from that that has not yet occurred?

Go on then, educate me.

Explain how the second relates to the first.

Take as many words as you like.

One word would suffice, but it might be a word that would offend.

 

[Brigadier]

One word would suffice, but it might be a word that would offend.

Face it, you can't explain the carp you wrote. Squirm again.

 

[Brigadier]

One word would suffice, but it might be a word that would offend.

When the argument's lost.....

 

[IWalkLikeHimaMartian]

You've got plenty enough already, DC.

Face it, you can't explain the carp you wrote. Squirm again.

When the argument's lost.....

Quite so, bragidear!

 

[Brigadier]

Re: the rerun referendum question then, you don't know what you'd do?

 

[Brigadier]

Why the "Bragidear", anyway, DC? I've never been anyone other than Brigadier on here.
You, on the other hand...........

 

[IWalkLikeHimaMartian]

Re: the rerun referendum question then, you don't know what you'd do?

I would do exactly the same as before, I would vote and I would vote in exactly the same way.
Have you decided not to vote, or to vote differently?

 

[IWalkLikeHimaMartian]

Why the "Bragidear", anyway, DC? I've never been anyone other than Brigadier on here.
You, on the other hand...........

Simple, you have decided to address me in some peculiar way, so I thought I would return the favour, bragidear.

 

[Brigadier]

It having been sold as a "once in a lifetime"-type affair, I veer towards it being hypocritical to vote on the second one.
Certainly, I was unaware that the UK had enough cash sploshing around for all the upheaval, especially if it has to keep being rerun because one side doesn't like the result.

 

[Brigadier]

Simple, you have decided to address me in some peculiar way, so I thought I would return the favour, bragidear.

Try hypnotherapy, you might recall some things you've been repressing!