S
Who are you going to vote for?
- Thread starter ellal
- Start date
- Status
Sponsored Links
No doubt you will resurrect the same old tired gossip again soon, jimmy fidler.I believe you, Himmy.
Back on topic...
Seems like we might well have to go through that EU election after all...
May's latest request for an exemption is for 30th June
A help for her 'deal', or 'slowly, slowly, catchee monkey'?
Seems like we might well have to go through that EU election after all...
May's latest request for an exemption is for 30th June
A help for her 'deal', or 'slowly, slowly, catchee monkey'?
But it is obvious to all, except her, that her request is not available.
All it is doing is to further exasperate the EU and its constituent members.
After 12 April the EU has to divide up the empty UK seats, if there are any.
TM is yet again demonstrating that her field of vision is her disability.
It is what has brought us to this point, and it is what will continue to damage us further.
Sponsored Links
S
SammyInnit
I think neither side want it to happen and this is just sweeping it under the rug and hoping it goes away.
This speculation of another 12 month extension (haven't read the details) is just sounding a bit silly.
Not according to Tusk...
"He's proposing what he calls a "flextension" which could see the UK signing up to a one-year-long Brexit delay with the option to cut it short as soon as Parliament ratified the Brexit deal.
Mr Tusk believes the arrangement would suit the EU and the UK - and as one EU official put it to me: it would avoid Brussels potentially being faced with "endless" UK requests for repeated short extensions every few weeks."
Yes, but UK would have to fight the EU elections, the UK MEPs would then retire, or otherwise become redundant.
There can be no 'we might elect, or we might not elect MEPs'.
If the seats are available prior to the elections, and a member state is not going to contest them, they have to be divided among the other states.
TM will also have to explain the reasons for and the plan of action during such a flex-extension.
Last edited:
I think I read he is suggesting they could accept a suitable WA if it gets voted through, but with a confirmatory public vote, which I guess would be a choice of the deal and remain.
I suppose one could argue the 2016 referendum should've been a choice between a known possible deal and remain
I am sorry that you feel the truth is malicious
You must be more understanding Notch.
He might actually not remember being his previous names.
That's probably why he thinks he is being accused of impersonating them and that it is gossip.
He might actually not remember being his previous names.
That's probably why he thinks he is being accused of impersonating them and that it is gossip.
Here we go, another poster whose argument was totally destroyed and exposed for the racist gibberish that it was.
So all they have left is resort to malicious gossip.
S
SammyInnit
Notch has already called me a liar after I answered his straightforward question.Still wants us to believe it's not Him.
I do not care what you believe.
You, notch, et al have demonstrated that you prefer gossip to truth.
ELFImpudence has demonstrated that he prefers outdated, Victorian, scientifically disproven theories to reality.
I cannot change your minds. All I can do is to refute the gossip. It won't stop any of you believing whatever it is you want to believe.
It proves beyond question that you recognise that your arguments were well and truly rebutted. That is why you only have malicious gossip left in your armoury.
- Status
Sponsored Links
