You cannot have it both ways.
Either, there is only one race, therefore it is you who is saying there is no such thing as racism, but nonsensically use the word to mean prejudice against anyone with the slightest difference. E.g. (which started this) Bas calling Transam racist for making a steriotypical joke against the French.
You are the one that claims racist incidents cannot be racist because the people involved are the same race!
Racism is not only prejudice against others of a different ethnicity.
Islamophobia and antisemitism are forms of racism, but can exist between Jews and Palestinians.
Prejudice against French, Scots, Irish, etc, by British people is a form of racism.
As is prejudice against British by French, Irish, Scots, etc people.
Are all Irish jokes racist? I believe the Irish make the same jokes about people from Kerry; are they racist?
when jokes include some mythical stereotypical characteristic, then they may be racist, irrespective of who is the perpetrator.
Or, it only applies to the groups for what most people think racist, therefore those groups must be races - even if scientifically not accurate.
You are retreating into absurdity.
There is only one human race.
Racism is not about a scientifically based definition of race (for which one does not exist).
Racism is based on the socially constructed concept of race. We can interchange the word race for ethnicity, nationality or culture. In the animal world the word breed is used. That used to be a word used in human society, but is now considered impolite.
On the contrary, it is you who is diluting it by not limitting its use to what most people call racist.
Utter nonsense. The word 'racism' could be changed for ethnicitism, nationalism, culturalism , etc. But the word race is a left over from decades ago, when it was thought that there were different races.
Today's science has disproven that out-dated theory. But the term race, on which the term racism is based, remains in use.
Why is it that abuse against white footballers is not called racist?
Because it may not be based on stereotypical characteristics of white people?
I thought you could have worked that out for yourself.
Anyway, even if I were wrong in pointing out something is not racist, that does not mean I am racist.
It does when you rely on a fundamental racist ideology for your argument
Even if I wrongly correct you and state that an ant is not an insect, it does not make me an insect.
If insects could have an ideology, and you rely on that insect ideology to support your theory, it probably does prove that you are an insect. Your behaviour, your argument and your underlying ideology proves it.