- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 16,625
- Reaction score
- 2,338
- Country
A lot of people deserve better. Pensioners aren't special.The pensioners of the UK deserve better, than penny-pinching by government.
A lot of people deserve better. Pensioners aren't special.The pensioners of the UK deserve better, than penny-pinching by government.
There are always exceptions but I just don't believe that is a common situation.If your home is worth £1M, and you have no savings, you are reliant entirely on income - the pension. Over the limit, you will receive very little in the way of financial concessions. The £1M home will also likely need lots of expensive work to be done upon it, just to keep it in an habitable state.
not everybody qualified for cheap houses eitherAnd do you need an extra £4 per week? Honestly?
not everybody qualified for cheap houses either
read it how you like.Now then, stop digging at our Angela.
read it how you like.
But some pensioners got valuable houses without paying full price for them. Should they automatically qualify for wfa too ?
Avoided the real question thoughAnd the right to buy, is still in force for youngsters, today.
Avoided the real question though
I don't really see any relevance between the value of the home, and whether the occupant is living in poverty, or not. What are you suggesting, that pensioners should sell up the home they treasure and have worked hard for all their life, just to be able to stay warm?
Pensions, like wages, should properly reflect the cost of living.
still avoiding the question. why ?
In some countries. Not the ones who could see the problems with it.No, the right to buy scheme has been out, since 1980.
Harry wants poor people to pay the pensioner millionaire's bills because they are skint. But special.I thought it was usual to "downsize" if your income can't supply what you need?
No, the right to buy scheme has been out, since 1980.
Millions have benefitted, not just pensioners, so why pick on them.
Not the ones who could see the problems with it.