Yellowhammer document released: but title changed and no15 redacted

WastingTime.jpg


Buffoon.
 
Sponsored Links
Oh don't worry John, behind the scenes Boris will be working harder than a Polish plumber.
 
They can't help themselves Lower, as soon as they start to lose an argument, the insults start to flow. It's all they have.
So why dont you abide by your own measure?

Oh thats right you do - you lose every argument, hence why you resort to childish insults.
 
See my other post this is selfish games going on fck brexit fck the country they can wait, we want no.10

Wrong as usual.

No deal Brexit will fck the country.

Have you found any tangible benefits of Brexit yet?

No, because there arent any.

Poor old Festive, talking drivel as usual
 
Sponsored Links
There is absolutely no way you could consider what is in section 15 as a 'base' expectation. That is clearly a worst case.

I could potentially accept the expected closure of 2 refineries as a possible base scenario (although i don't believe it), but strikes and disrupted petrol supply is total speculation.

This document was never intended for consumption by the general public and therefore titles and content should not be taken as gospel. It was a document intended for use by people who knew its context and therefore you cannot quote it as what will happen.

It is a document that sets out what might happen so that mitigation plans can be put in place.

https://twitter.com/theSNP/status/1172138748089446402?s=19

@NicolaSturgeon confirms the UK Government’s Brexit document, outlining potential chaos of a No-Deal Brexit, had the title “Base Scenario” when it was sent to @scotgov.

How many times boyo you want to be proven wrong defending this shambolic Government.
 
https://twitter.com/theSNP/status/1172138748089446402?s=19

@NicolaSturgeon confirms the UK Government’s Brexit document, outlining potential chaos of a No-Deal Brexit, had the title “Base Scenario” when it was sent to @scotgov.

How many times boyo you want to be proven wrong defending this shambolic Government.
As i said, context and intended audience are hugely significant. if you create the document to identify the potential problems you intend to mitigate, you may well call it the base scenario. When its then released to all and sundry the title suddenly changes meaning.

This is exactly why government should be allowed to generate documents that remain confidential.
 
Seriously? Your kidding right.
Seriously. I generally find their articles factual, informative, well written and lack the hysteria and extreme sensationalism of a lot of news providers. I find its normally reasonably well balanced and not afraid to criticise the government although i accept there is a pro conservative bias.
 
"A former head of the civil service has accused the government of being "neither honest nor open" about the potential impact of a no-deal Brexit."

"He said: "The leaked document was called the base scenario, which means it could be better or it could be worse.

"This document, the same document that's been published, is called the reasonable worst-case scenario, i.e. it suggests it is the worst possible scenario.

"And that I'm afraid is not honest in the way in which it's been done.""


https://news.sky.com/story/neither-...nder-fire-over-no-deal-brexit-impact-11807732
 
Seriously. I generally find their articles factual, informative, well written and lack the hysteria and extreme sensationalism of a lot of news providers. I find its normally reasonably well balanced and not afraid to criticise the government although i accept there is a pro conservative bias.

The Telegraph is the SUN in a pin striped suit.

They would rather keep a key advertiser in HSBC happy then cover their tax issues.

https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/opendemocracyuk/why-i-have-resigned-from-telegraph/

The coverage of HSBC in Britain's Telegraph is a fraud on its readers. If major newspapers allow corporations to influence their content for fear of losing advertising revenue, democracy itself is in peril.

Yesterdays Telegraph front page was illuminating in its lack of coverage of what has transpired for Bojo.
 
Seriously. I generally find their articles factual, informative, well written and lack the hysteria and extreme sensationalism of a lot of news providers

I read the paper version of the Telgraph 2 to 3 times a week.

Its news sections, editorials and letters page are entirely 100% pro Brexit and pro Tory.
If you are being fed a diet of Brexit from the Telegraph you will not have a balanced view.

The business wection is more balanced because it is factual rather than political.

To get a balanced view the telegraph should be read alongside the FT, new European, independant or Guardian.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top