So why dont you abide by your own measure?They can't help themselves Lower, as soon as they start to lose an argument, the insults start to flow. It's all they have.
See my other post this is selfish games going on fck brexit fck the country they can wait, we want no.10
nope, torygraph
nope, torygraph
There is absolutely no way you could consider what is in section 15 as a 'base' expectation. That is clearly a worst case.
I could potentially accept the expected closure of 2 refineries as a possible base scenario (although i don't believe it), but strikes and disrupted petrol supply is total speculation.
This document was never intended for consumption by the general public and therefore titles and content should not be taken as gospel. It was a document intended for use by people who knew its context and therefore you cannot quote it as what will happen.
It is a document that sets out what might happen so that mitigation plans can be put in place.
The Scottish judges have clearly interfered in politics.
As i said, context and intended audience are hugely significant. if you create the document to identify the potential problems you intend to mitigate, you may well call it the base scenario. When its then released to all and sundry the title suddenly changes meaning.https://twitter.com/theSNP/status/1172138748089446402?s=19
@NicolaSturgeon confirms the UK Government’s Brexit document, outlining potential chaos of a No-Deal Brexit, had the title “Base Scenario” when it was sent to @scotgov.
How many times boyo you want to be proven wrong defending this shambolic Government.
Seriously. I generally find their articles factual, informative, well written and lack the hysteria and extreme sensationalism of a lot of news providers. I find its normally reasonably well balanced and not afraid to criticise the government although i accept there is a pro conservative bias.Seriously? Your kidding right.
Seriously. I generally find their articles factual, informative, well written and lack the hysteria and extreme sensationalism of a lot of news providers. I find its normally reasonably well balanced and not afraid to criticise the government although i accept there is a pro conservative bias.
Seriously. I generally find their articles factual, informative, well written and lack the hysteria and extreme sensationalism of a lot of news providers