If nobody with access to a soft copy pastes them in I'll do a precis tomorrow...ban-all-sheds, would you mind telling us what 412.1.3 and 553.1 say? I (and I assume many others) don't own a copy of the regulations.
If nobody with access to a soft copy pastes them in I'll do a precis tomorrow...ban-all-sheds, would you mind telling us what 412.1.3 and 553.1 say? I (and I assume many others) don't own a copy of the regulations.
If nobody with access to a soft copy pastes them in I'll do a precis tomorrow...ban-all-sheds, would you mind telling us what 412.1.3 and 553.1 say? I (and I assume many others) don't own a copy of the regulations.
Hope you've got PLI to cover that...
I might be wrong, but I'm pretty sure that if you clear away the snow you become liable for the condition of the surface, so it it then becomes icy and someone slips it's your fault.
Other than the law requiring reasonable provision for safety, and I would suggest that a cpc-less circuit installed in contravention not just of the current version of the wiring regs but also old versions stretching back for decades would not qualify as reasonable.
Nothing to stop you running an earth to the point and leaving it disconnected behind the socket, in case it's wanted at some future date. If you were using T&E you'd have that anyway.
Yes - I guess you could do that, and join it in the box.Nothing to stop you running an earth to the point and leaving it disconnected behind the socket, in case it's wanted at some future date. If you were using T&E you'd have that anyway.
There's still 412.1.3 and 553.1 to overcome though...
412.2.3.2 Except where Regulation 412.1.3 applies, a circuit supplying one or more items of Class II equipment shall have a circuit protective conductor run to and terminated at each point in wiring and at each accessory.
The main problem I can see in terms of 'reasonable provision for safety' is not so much the lack of earth but that (and I'm making an assumption here based on the fact the OP said they were 'old bakelite') they most probably lack safety shutters. I don't recall ever seeing any 2 pin BS546 that were shuttered.
The main problem I can see in terms of 'reasonable provision for safety' is not so much the lack of earth but that (and I'm making an assumption here based on the fact the OP said they were 'old bakelite') they most probably lack safety shutters. I don't recall ever seeing any 2 pin BS546 that were shuttered.
If a standard BC lampholder is still considered to meet the requirement of "reasonable provision for safety," then I can't see how non-shuttered sockets would fall foul of it.
Neither can I, in a world of 8 feet tall two year olds.
When you're in court accused of manslaughter because a toddler is dead after sticking a paper clip into an unshuttered non compliant socket, try it on the judge.
But you do see my point - unshuttered sockets have been a bete noir of BS7671 for years.
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local