As you say, older people, and those in poor health, should lay down their lives for the benefit of business profits.
For the greater good yes once everyone has had their vaccines, there is many more people this affects than just businesses..
As you say, older people, and those in poor health, should lay down their lives for the benefit of business profits.
once everyone has had their vaccines
From the candidates standing as party leader
that's not what you said.
to try and put words in that I didn't say
At some point we're just gonna have to Don out big boy and big girl pants and get on with life.
Survival of the fittest and all that
there could even be a little red book that would be compulsory reading
Would Corbyn have delayed testing capacity in order to get private labs up and running?Do you think Corbyn would have done better
I'm no fan of Corbyn, but why wouldn't he have done better?
Any government could have decided to approve vaccines quickly and buy lots. Why assume that because one did no other one would?We could easily be hooked in to some EU vaccine scheme listening to apologies as to why we wont get the vaccine until the rest of the EU 27 have been done.
In what way would that be worse than the non-coalition government paralysed in to doing nothing very late which we have now?We could easily also be in some coalition government paralysed in to doing nothing very late.
Obviously in your world not engaging in bribery and corruption does not count as "better".He's a bit of a Wally, but I can't think of anyone from the available choices who'd have been any better.
IMO anyone who thinks that someone who is deceitful, dishonest, a known liar, lazy, incompetent and not dedicated to the job would make a good PM is beyond reason.From the candidates standing as party leader and therefore PM at the last GE, yes.
corect.I note you are not saying that you think the Buffoon is the best person to lead the country in a crisis.
is what you just did.
It isn't what you said originally.
nothing in here about vaccines.