This inflation calculator uses the official UK consumer price index. An inflation rate of 3.09% per year means £100 in 1994 is worth £249.28 in 2024.12 hours a few mins to earn £100
Some older people may be inclined to ignore inflation.
This inflation calculator uses the official UK consumer price index. An inflation rate of 3.09% per year means £100 in 1994 is worth £249.28 in 2024.12 hours a few mins to earn £100
It's the same in many sectors public and private. Underinvestment year in year out, even decade in decade out, and then surprise surprise we're up against it because it then becomes a case of 'to bring X up to current standards will require an investment of Y billions.'The "inflation-busting" pay rises only become necessary because they're few and far between: if they got smaller annual raises, the country could manage that better, and the RW meeja wouldn't have anything to crow about.
But, as is typical of those "guardians of the economy", they underfund the public sector and infrastructure, shovel money into chums' contracts / pockets, and then foment employee unrest.
Earlswood?chose a house just under a mile from redhill station
retention in public services such as nurses, doctors etc is very low........so the NHS has to try and recruit from foreign countries.........which people like you moan aboutSo basically the same as the rest of the country unless you can provide examples of other trades or industries getting inflation matching or inflation busting pay rises. Can you?
We never seem to learn ...
I blame austerity. Cutting out spending on maintenance and upkeep always comes back to biteIt's the same in many sectors public and private. Underinvestment year in year out, even decade in decade out, and then surprise surprise we're up against it because it then becomes a case of 'to bring X up to current standards will require an investment of Y billions.'
We never seem to learn ...
I don't discount the financial struggle of budgets either, although I'm by no means defending government and councils for bad planning.I blame austerity. Cutting out spending on maintenance and upkeep always comes back to bite
I don't deny any of thatI don't discount the financial struggle of budgets either, although I'm by no means defending government and councils for bad planning.
I used to have budgetary responsibility and, within my 'funding envelope' I was always firefighting. I used to allocate something like £50k to task x each year. Management were shocked when I produced a report showing to maintain best practice, in reality I would require £200k ... per year ... every year.
Needless to say it never happened, so spinning the financial plates continued.
the other direction [north] Lyndale road rh1 2ha in a 1907 victorian terrace [still there now lol]Earlswood?
I had a mate who used to live there, loads of nice Victorian semis
austerity in general is pure madnessI blame austerity. Cutting out spending on maintenance and upkeep always comes back to bite
There is another factor involved. What the country can afford to do. Then comes the priories on how much that is available is spent. Blare managed to increase the NHS spend and left it in a better state than it is now. We even had growth. The IMF visited and told him he couldn't afford to do this but that turned out to be incorrect.It's the same in many sectors public and private. Underinvestment year in year out, even decade in decade out, and then surprise surprise we're up against it because it then becomes a case of 'to bring X up to current standards will require an investment of Y billions.'
We never seem to learn ...
Serves them right for voting him in ...I'm sure the people of Clacton are happy to see their MP working hard in their interest.