Predictable flouncey posturing from the RWR. Of course folk are going to respond to the police dropping the case. You think MBK has the monopoly.Surely not.![]()
Predictable flouncey posturing from the RWR. Of course folk are going to respond to the police dropping the case. You think MBK has the monopoly.Surely not.![]()
nice strawman, answering something I never saidYou can't sue someone for defamation because they reported you to the police.
No.No doubt the forum idiots will be along shortly claiming she's been cleared of failure to pay taxes due or council tax fraud. she hasn't.
what were they doing then?with a comment that they were never investigating tax issues or council tax fraud as this is outside their remit
what were they doing then?
A = forced to be complicit in a false smear used as a political distraction
Do you have a link, please?It's great fun reading the meltdowns in the comments sections of the Mail and Telegraph.
We got that from the post title, but thanks for the reminder. Doesn't answer Notch's question though.It’s politics
Has always been so
We got that from the post title, but thanks for the reminder. Doesn't answer Notch's question though.
Nobody has falsely smeared Angela Rayner.I am sure Motorbiking will be along to apologise for making false smears against Angela Rayner for 132 pages
The investigation has done her a favour.I don’t quite see what it had to do with plod any way