D
Deleted member 221031
Rest your case lol.The conclusion of the article says it was a wise decision
I rest my case
You’re that dim you think selling an appreciating asset is a good idea!
Absolutely clueless
Rest your case lol.The conclusion of the article says it was a wise decision
I rest my case
The article thought it was the best decision at the time.You’re that dim you think selling an appreciating asset is a good idea!
Yes lets bring this thread back to the prime suspect.
Police launch investigation into claims Angela Rayner broke law
Greater Manchester Police confirmed it was looking into claims that the Labour deputy leader may have broken electoral law by registering at the wrong address.www.dailymail.co.uk
so her neighbours were lying and her social media posts were fake?
That’s proves the reporter knows as much as Notchy.The article thought it was the best decision at the time.
Gold being one of the most valuable and reliable assets on the planet, you’d have to be a complete idiot to sell it at all,
much better qualified than a plumberThat’s proves the reporter knows as much as Notchy
The press are running with it.. not just the so called right wing press.The neighbours could be mistaken. The social media posts only prove that she spent some time at her husband's house. She has never denied that. Probably not enough proof for it go anywhere.
So America, China, Russia, Germany, Italy etc..Tim Focas, director of financial services for Westminster think tank Parliament Street, says YES.
While Gordon Brown could have sold at a better price, for the vast majority of governments across established economies, there is no real point to holding gold.
The purpose of foreign exchange reserves is not for the state to manage wealth on behalf of the country. People should do this for themselves.
UK reserves should only really be used to underpin monetary policy, and to halt any possible crisis such as a significant run on the pound, not as any kind of sovereign wealth fund. The trouble is that gold is not well suited as a state asset, as its value is very likely to drop as soon as it is deployed as a government intervention mechanism.
Countries put different values on economic gambles...So America, China, Russia, Germany, Italy etc..
Are all daft and have no need for their gold reserves.
And who bought the gold Brown sold ?So America, China, Russia, Germany, Italy etc..
Are all daft and have no need for their gold reserves.
That was a vote.Countries put different values on economic gambles...
Was the UK right to decide it had no need to be in the EU, given that the losses already massively exceed the selling of that gold?
'Daft' can be seen as a relative term
And one Cameron thought he wouldn't lose and finally lance the boil of those who wanted to leave.That was a vote.
No it wasn't.Selling gold is beyond stupid!
I suspect there will be a number of MP's who have been confused where they live for electoral purposes, especially with all the confusion over expenses claims and where they live. They should be careful what they wish for with AR. Giving the wrong address for voting is serious and it will be run with if anything comes of the investigation.It wont go anywhere, the electoral fraud is not the issue. The tax evasions and hypocrisy is.