- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 17,141
- Reaction score
- 2,394
- Country
I believe the judge.I know he wasn’t charged worth rape!
I believe the judge.I know he wasn’t charged worth rape!
NWGS is a trollBased on the Federal definition of rape, he didn't just make it up.
I’m not defending anyone, please re read my posts.It's amazing the lengths they go to in defending a convicted felon, adulterer, rapist and good friend of Epstein. He can do no wrong.
But we can agree has wasn’t charged ?I believe the judge.
NWGS is a troll
His posts are never more than a few words….classic trolling MO
I’m not defending anyone, please re read my posts.
I’m asking you to prove he was charged with rape, you can’t and haven’t done so.
No need to make things up and get nasty. I asked a question that’s all.
No you didn't, you asked me to prove he is a rapist, which is exactly what the jury found him liable for, as explained by a federal judge. That's just a fact.I’m asking you to prove he was charged with rape
No you didn't, you asked me to prove he is a rapist, which is exactly what the jury found him liable for, as explained by a federal judge. That's just a fact.
I believe the judge, not you. If you want to defend his behaviour then crack on.You haven’t proved he’s a rapist, he’s not been charged with it.
So by default he’s not guilty.
Like I said, re read my posts.I believe the judge, not you. I you want to defend his behaviour then crack on.
The judge said that he really did rape her and the jury found him liable for it. What do actually think is wrong with the judge's reasoning and findings?I don’t know either way.
He's a convicted felon and he's running for president. He has said if he had to, he would run the country from prison.But can a convicted rapist run for presidency?
The not guilty verdict didn’t helpThe judge said that he really did rape her and the jury found him liable for it. What do actually think is wrong with the judge's reasoning and findings?