Can Kamala Harris win?

[Brigadier]

Can you prove he’s a rapist ?

You can’t, just more hot air.

Do you hate all women, or just 26 of them?

 

[Nwgs2]

Do you hate all women, or just 26 of them?

So no proof then ?

Thought so

 

[Notch7]

So no proof then ?

Thought so

“Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll”​

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/07/19/trump-carroll-judge-rape/

The word of a judge is worth more than pipe a pipe bender

 

[Nwgs2]

“Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll”​

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/07/19/trump-carroll-judge-rape/

The word of a judge is worth more than pipe a pipe bender

Despite Carroll’s claims that Trump had raped her, they noted, the jury stopped short of saying he committed that particular offense

From your article!! Hmmmmmmmm

 

[denso13]

Can you prove he’s a rapist ?

Course I can, I wouldn't have written it otherwise.

 

[Nwgs2]

Course I can, I wouldn't have written it otherwise.

But this proof won’t materialise now will it ?

 

[denso13]

But this proof won’t materialise now will it ?

I believe the judge, not you.

 

[Nwgs2]

I believe the judge, not you.

So you can’t prove it then ?

Thought as much.

And I don’t know either way, I was asking for proof, since you made the statement!!

 

[denso13]

So you can’t prove it then ?

Course I can, I wouldn't have written it otherwise.

 

[JohnD]

"The judge said the section requires vaginal penetration by a penis while forcible penetration without consent of the vagina or other bodily orifices by fingers or anything else is labeled “sexual abuse” rather than “rape.”

He said the definition of rape was “far narrower” than how rape is defined in common modern parlance, in some dictionaries, in some federal and state criminal statutes and elsewhere.



The judge said the verdict did not mean that Carroll “failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape.’ Indeed ... the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

Trump’s lawyers were correct in arguing that the $2 million award for sexual abuse would have been excessive if the jury based the compensatory award on a conclusion that Trump had groped Carroll’s breasts through her clothing or similar conduct, the judge said. But, he said, that’s not what the jury found."

Judge upholds the $5 million jury verdict against Trump in a writer's sex abuse and defamation case

A federal judge rejected Trump's claim the jury vindicated him by failing to conclude in a civil case that he raped a columnist in a New York department store in the 1990s.

apnews.com

Trump disagrees. So does his supporter Nwgs.

 

[Nwgs2]

Course I can, I wouldn't have written it otherwise.

Please could you prove it then?

Or we’ll say you’re wrong.

 

[Nwgs2]

"The judge said the section requires vaginal penetration by a penis while forcible penetration without consent of the vagina or other bodily orifices by fingers or anything else is labeled “sexual abuse” rather than “rape.”

He said the definition of rape was “far narrower” than how rape is defined in common modern parlance, in some dictionaries, in some federal and state criminal statutes and elsewhere.



The judge said the verdict did not mean that Carroll “failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape.’ Indeed ... the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

Trump’s lawyers were correct in arguing that the $2 million award for sexual abuse would have been excessive if the jury based the compensatory award on a conclusion that Trump had groped Carroll’s breasts through her clothing or similar conduct, the judge said. But, he said, that’s not what the jury found."

Judge upholds the $5 million jury verdict against Trump in a writer's sex abuse and defamation case

A federal judge rejected Trump's claim the jury vindicated him by failing to conclude in a civil case that he raped a columnist in a New York department store in the 1990s.

apnews.com

Trump disagrees. So does his supporter Nwgs.

I’m simply asking for proof!

That’s not roo much to ask ? Given the statement!

 

[denso13]

Please could you prove it then?

It's already been proven. I believe the judge who said Dump really is a rapist.

 

[Nwgs2]

It's already been proven. I believe the judge who said Dump really is a rapist.

It hasn’t been proven. Or you’d have said-proven rapist

I won’t press anymore. I’ve got some Bucky to drink now.

 

[denso13]

Or we’ll say you’re wrong.

I really don't care. Rapist apologists will never be convinced.