Chlorine washed chicken

Sponsored Links
Just the mainstream agencies. I don't go in for the extreme stuff like the RWR. It's pointless because they are hopelessly biased.

The point I was making was that if enough mainstream news agencies report a story, and the content is similar, then it stands a good chance of being correct.
It is only the Daily Wail that is untrustworthy and openly lies.
So the Daily Depress is an accurate source in your opinion?.. Many newspapers get their stories from one source, if that is biased or inaccurate then the story will be inaccurate... What is the source of their information
 
Many newspapers get their stories from one source, if that is biased or inaccurate then the story will be inaccurate... What is the source of their information
You really think mainstream news agencies publish or televise a story, having come from a single source, without checking or verifying?

You seriously believe several news agencies would simultaneously make up a story about two of the biggest names in politics? There were other honest people in the room when Trump said what he said to Merkel. By the way, the story is still out there. Nothing has been redacted.

No boyo, that story was true. Stop clutching at straws, you are strating to look very weird.
 
Sponsored Links
You really think mainstream news agencies publish or televise a story, having come from a single source, without checking or verifying?

You seriously believe several news agencies would simultaneously make up a story about two of the biggest names in politics? There were other honest people in the room when Trump said what he said to Merkel. By the way, the story is still out there. Nothing has been redacted.

No boyo, that story was true. Stop clutching at straws, you are strating to look very weird.
OK duck... But what happened to the story of us agreeing to pay £36 billion to the EU the other day... Seems that it was a load of hogwash, did they not check to see if it was true before the printed it... Did they not verify it?

Yes Newspapers make up stories all the time..
 
OK duck... But what happened to the story of us agreeing to pay £36 billion to the EU the other day... Seems that it was a load of hogwash, did they not check to see if it was true before the printed it... Did they not verify it?

Yes Newspapers make up stories all the time..
News agencies reported that a political source said there was talk of a settlement. This was true. The agencies did not make it up. You are getting confused boyo. Take a nap and sober up.
Read the WHOLE article. Nothing has been redacted.

http://news.sky.com/story/uk-prepared-to-pay-36bn-for-eu-divorce-bill-reports-10976372
 
News agencies reported that a political source said there was talk of a settlement. This was true. The agencies did not make it up. You are getting confused boyo. Take a nap and sober up.
I'll have an oatcake too... The media love spreading fake news.... It sells their rags
 
OK duck... But what happened to the story of us agreeing to pay £36 billion to the EU the other day... Seems that it was a load of hogwash
What makes you think it was hogwash?


Downing Street refused to make any official comment while pointing out negotiations are ongoing.
 
I'll have an oatcake too... The media love spreading fake news.... It sells their rags
Yes, yes, of course they do. Now go and have that lie down. They all colluded and made stories up about Tumpy and Agelica. Silly news agencies.
Sweet dreams.
 
What makes you think it was hogwash?


Downing Street refused to make any official comment while pointing out negotiations are ongoing.
The only way it would have been factual is if Downingstreet had said that they may pay £36Billion... otherwise it was a deliberate attempt to mislead
 
You really think mainstream news agencies publish or televise a story, having come from a single source, without checking or verifying?
Didn't the BBC run with the Cliff Richard "abuse " story,, without verifying the facts beforehand? I seem to remember them shooting footage of the police arriving at his gaff (what a scoop ehh)
 
Didn't the BBC run with the Cliff Richard "abuse " story,, without verifying the facts beforehand? I seem to remember them shooting footage of the police arriving at his gaff (what a scoop ehh)
Invasion of privacy is accountable - yes. Cliff was under investigation at the time and this was reported accurately. You are getting confused like Firegrouch.
 
Last edited:
The only way it would have been factual is if Downingstreet had said that they may pay £36Billion... otherwise it was a deliberate attempt to mislead
Blame the source then. The news agencies never made it up. And the reason Brexit politicians are so angry about it goes to show that it may turn out to be accurate.
 
Last edited:
Sponsored Links
Back
Top