Concentration camps

[peaps2]

Why don't we just close this thread - many more have been closed with more worthy debates - this is just two trolls battling out a pointless argument.
The Holocaust denier has admitted it happened.
All that's left is an argument about numbers which neither side can prove.

why dont you go crawl back under a rock?

 

[joe-90]

Why don't we just close this thread - many more have been closed with more worthy debates - this is just two trolls battling out a pointless argument.
The Holocaust denier has admitted it happened.
All that's left is an argument about numbers which neither side can prove.

You can't be accused of being a denier when you've never suggested nothing happened. Just what happened and to how many people is what is being debated. If you don't like the thread then you know where the door is.

 

[alumni]

Why don't we just close this thread - many more have been closed with more worthy debates - this is just two trolls battling out a pointless argument.
The Holocaust denier has admitted it happened.
All that's left is an argument about numbers which neither side can prove.

Clearly you've not read the 3 threads then.
Best you spend some time to get acquainted with them before making anymore silly comments.

 

[alumni]

Still waiting Joe

It's a simple task for you.

 

[joe-90]

Not as simple as this:

Post it then. Right here and right now.

PUT UP OR SHUT UP.

 

[alumni]

Joe. You have posted lies.
You have been asked to retract them. Surely even you can go back to this mornings posts.

So it would seem until shown otherwise your argument is based on lies.

 

[joe-90]

You are making the accusations. Post them right here right now.

Put up or shut up.

If you are accusing me of telling lies (as opposed to an inconvenient truth)
then have the decency to show me what you are accusing me of.

Do it. Post it HERE.

 

[wobs]

Why don't we just close this thread - many more have been closed with more worthy debates - this is just two trolls battling out a pointless argument.
The Holocaust denier has admitted it happened.
All that's left is an argument about numbers which neither side can prove.

You can't be accused of being a denier when you've never suggested nothing happened. Just what happened and to how many people is what is being debated.....

Wrong.

Holocaust denial is the act of denying the genocide of Jews in the Holocaust during World War II.[1] The key claims of Holocaust denial are: the German Nazi government had no official policy or intention of exterminating Jews, Nazi authorities did not use extermination camps and gas chambers to mass murder Jews, and the actual number of Jews killed was significantly (typically an order of magnitude) lower than the historically accepted figure of 5 to 6 million.[2][3][4]

Holocaust deniers generally do not accept the term denial as an appropriate description of their activities, and use the term revisionism instead.[5] Scholars use the term "denial" to differentiate Holocaust deniers from historical revisionists, who use established historical methodologies.[6] The methodologies of Holocaust deniers are criticized as based on a predetermined conclusion that ignores extensive historical evidence to the contrary.[7]

Most Holocaust denial claims imply, or openly state, that the Holocaust is a hoax arising out of a deliberate Jewish conspiracy to advance the interest of Jews at the expense of other peoples.[8] For this reason, Holocaust denial is generally considered to be an antisemitic[9] conspiracy theory.[10]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocaust_denial

 

[joe-90]

Well you tell me where the bodies of the 12 million are then. If you can't - then you must be a denier too.

 

[mdf290]

You can't be accused of being a denier when you've never suggested nothing happened. Just what happened and to how many people is what is being debated. If you don't like the thread then you know where the door is.

Carry on if you wish... tbh I would expect both sides to have just agreed to differ on this one.

I think I have a valid point to offer and that is that noone is obviously ever going to 'WIN' this argument so unless it is going to continue for the next fifty years it may as well be locked.

 

[joe-90]

Why should it be locked? Because it is popular? If you don't like - leave it. Simples.

 

[mdf290]

Why should it be locked? Because it is popular? If you don't like - leave it. Simples.

Popular...lol is that what you think..??

I suggest you put up a poll asking whether the thread is popular or not.

 

[joe-90]

6285 views.

What would you call it?

 

[Starspark1]

I would call it people looking realising what drivel could possibly go on for so long then thinking christ i cant be arsed with this!!!

 

[joe-90]

go away then. Sorted.