You mean like having a **** healthcare system, decrepit infrastructure and a broken legal system with overflowing prisons, as well as literal **** floating down the Thames?
It's a Wail-esque approach. They use the same tired tactic when they ask the dumb question about refugees...." how many should we let in".
must be some reason why motorbiking hasn't psed off yet.
Motorbiking has illustrated 2 factors. As incomes go up ~around ~average numbers start to dwindle, The ~ as the whole area is blurred. There aren't any fixed points it's just a trend. The other is it varies around the country. So you add some new threshold and it will apply to fewer and fewer people and those who live in more affluent areas pay more but they are a small proportion of the population. If you want an extra £1b it needs to be related to the number who earn enough to pay it. I think more progressive is better eg one form
He's the same as any voter and is entitled to gripe about the politics of the party he never voted for.
of course you are - you like other people to pay more tax so you can enjoy the benefit of less tax.
Isn't that your definition of a parasite.?
Such is life.
Yes, and taxing those who can pay is an available resource.
When are you emigrating?
Yet as far as he is concerned Labour is mostly no different to the Tory plan. The new guy's aim is to help Dyson compete with his competition. They have had a long time to catch up with him. His design history has given him an advantage but that is flagging on brand new products.
