Covid Inquiry

[noseall]

yeah jabs are working fine

Correct.

 

[gant]

Correct.

Are you sure, you don't seem to be going off one about Trump at 5 in the morning like you used to.
Booster?

 

[denso13]

Are you sure

Safety & effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines: A narrative review

There are currently eight vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 that have received Emergency Use Authorization by the WHO that can offer some protection to the world’s population during the COVID-19 pandemic. Though research is being published all over ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

 

[gas112]

Had You Known, Would You Have Taken the Jab? ⋆ Brownstone Institute

The steep drop in demand for Covid shots reveals how Pfizer depended upon fraud to promote their most lucrative product. Once Americans knew the truth, demand dropped by over 75%. Now, Paxton’s suit brings that fraud to trial.

brownstone.org

 

[denso13]

Had You Known, Would You Have Taken the Jab? ⋆ Brownstone Institute

The steep drop in demand for Covid shots reveals how Pfizer depended upon fraud to promote their most lucrative product. Once Americans knew the truth, demand dropped by over 75%. Now, Paxton’s suit brings that fraud to trial.

brownstone.org

That's the Paxton whacko allegations all over again. It hasn't been proved yet.

The peer reviewed one I posted shows that Pfizer's claims were, on the whole, correct.

 

[denso13]

New Institute Has Ties to the Great Barrington Declaration

All three GBD lead authors contribute to Brownstone Institute

www.medpagetoday.com

 

[gant]

See what I mean how your quick to go the defensive and dismiss out of hand any alternative view.
Why discuss anything with you given that attitude.

 

[gas112]

That's the Paxton whacko allegations all over again. It hasn't been proved yet.

The peer reviewed one I posted shows that Pfizer's claims were, on the whole, correct.

So why have you used the word YET are you starting to get doubts oh wise one ?
On the whole correct so you mean they lied in bits glad you cleared that up

 

[denso13]

See what I mean how your quick to go the defensive and dismiss out of hand any alternative view.

It hasn't been to court yet but now being relied on a facts. You don't think that's a bit strange?

 

[Notch7]

See what I mean how your quick to go the defensive and dismiss out of hand any alternative view.
Why discuss anything with you given that attitude.

Denso has dismissed it with evidence

you are free to provide a counterargument the the Great Barrington Declaration isnt a load of bolox, but you cant because it is

 

[denso13]

So why have you used the word YET are you starting to get doubts oh wise one ?

It hasn't been to court YET. I can't think of a more apt word but I'm open to suggestions.

so you mean they lied in bits

No.

 

[gant]

.

 

[gant]

you are free to provide a counterargument the the Great Barrington Declaration isnt a load of bolox, but you cant because it is

UK Covid inquiry turns its focus to Great Barrington Declaration - Collateral Global

Lockdown sceptics are being exposed to a very different line of questioning.

collateralglobal.org

 

[Notch7]

UK Covid inquiry turns its focus to Great Barrington Declaration - Collateral Global

Lockdown sceptics are being exposed to a very different line of questioning.

collateralglobal.org

thank you for that link it shows exactly what total bolox the GBD was

here is the key bit:

"the central premise of the GBD was that Covid policies were causing significant social harms and that a different approach, called “Focused Protection”


"focused protection"
nowhere in the GBD does it explain what that actually is, how you identify who needs protecting nor how it could be done

in other words its complete bolox

here are some actual experts who show it was a load of horse pizz

expert reaction to Barrington Declaration, an open letter arguing against lockdown policies and for ‘Focused Protection’ | Science Media Centre

 

[carmanmemoranda]

The person making the claim needs to provide evidence

Yep. Fully agree