daneski88

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yep, in old money :LOL: I'll have the Butler call round tomorrow
 
Sponsored Links
Unfortunately, under his original username he was warned numerous times about abusive postings on the forum. Sadly he did not heed the warnings and persisted which ultimately resulted in a permanent ban. Subsequent incarnations using supposedly 'covert' means (proxies etc) have been disabled when found.

We don't take banning a user lightly, in fact disregarding spam accounts it hasn't happened very often over the years, but when warnings are issued and persistently disregarded, there is no other option.

Thanks for the reply Admin.

As dex he did get embroiled in number heated debates with people that were far more abusive than he ever was. Some would think his replies were often justified in light of the attacks that were made on him. But in any case that is done and dusted.

But back to daneski88 who has been, Completely rehabilitated, reinvigorated, reassimilated and finally relocated (you've probably heard the line) is a reformed character who, imho should have been allowed to stay as strangely, some of us like him.

There is at least two far more troublesome posters that have been allowed to return time and again under various names. So any chance you will reconsider?
 
there are posters on this forum far more abusive than daneski who don't get banned.
did the alleged abusive posts occur whilst he was on holiday?
We have some odd mods here. I've had a piece of (joke) poetry deleted yet ethnic attacks go untouched.
 
Sponsored Links
What 'abusive posts'? I cannot recall abusive posts for daneski88.

With respect Admin, I and many others, believe a 'witch hunt' has been orchestrated by certain Mods against daneski88. He is a respectable man with a responsible job. He does NOT set out to 'abuse' ANYONE.

I appeal to you to remove the ban.

Thank you.
 
ive never known him be abusive

bit sharp on occasion but hey we have all been there :oops:

why not ban the mouth in the sparks forum if it comes to that :idea:

i vote with blas
usa.gif
 
With respect, when abusive posts are removed publicly from the forum, they are logged and recorded, because you don't recall them doesn't mean it didn't happen. Sometimes a mods action may appear harsh because you can only see the aftermath - both sides of the story cannot be seen, but anything removed by a mod is accessible by admin.
 
This just came through from daneski88:

Take care and send my regards to those that knew me.

Yep, that sounds like the words of an abusive man to me... NOT!

THIS PLACE IS FULL OF INEQUALITY AND INJUSTICE. AS KEV SAYS, IT SEEMS OK FOR SOME BUT NOT FOR OTHERS! RATHER PATHETIC!!!!

With respect, when abusive posts are removed publicly from the forum, they are logged and recorded, because you don't recall them doesn't mean it didn't happen. Sometimes a mods action may appear harsh because you can only see the aftermath - both sides of the story cannot be seen, but anything removed by a mod is accessible by admin.
So I repeat, as kev has said, WHY not ban others who have been abusive? Or is it only a banning offence if you have a go at a Mod and/or Admin?
 
With respect, when abusive posts are removed publicly from the forum, they are logged and recorded, because you don't recall them doesn't mean it didn't happen. Sometimes a mods action may appear harsh because you can only see the aftermath - both sides of the story cannot be seen, but anything removed by a mod is accessible by admin.

Has he been banned for posting as dex or as daneski88? because otherthan having a very trivial spat with mickymoody I cant remember a single abusive post from him, but as you say I may not have seen it. However, it does seem to me that someone clearly had it in for him treating him differently to other forum members.
 
what about the screwfux rejects dick puller for one banned

then re registers as delta t

so how come he ain't banned

should be the man is a complete ass

one law for methinks :evil:
 
Dear Admin,
I have quite a good memory and I recall accurately that I started a thread and submitted a poem entitled 'Owed to Hiawatha', based loosely on Henry Wadsworth Longfellows' similarly named tome.
It was a thought-invoking, only slightly cutting, observation on the content of certain posters' abusive posts, and I didn't object to anyone's replies, yet the whole thread was deleted.

Any explanation for that one?
 
Dear Admin,
I have quite a good memory and I recall accurately that I started a thread and submitted a poem entitled 'Owed to Hiawatha', based loosely on Henry Wadsworth Longfellows' similarly named tome.
It was a thought-invoking, only slightly cutting, observation on the content of certain posters' abusive posts, and I didn't object to anyone's replies, yet the whole thread was deleted.

Any explanation for that one?

LGM,
Can we keep this about our mate please ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
Back
Top