Excess Deaths Debate 16th January 2024

[Odds]

So why does the link I posted suggest you don't give your child the jab unless necessary. Too much to comprehend.

Because children are less likely to catch the virus.

 

[gant]

Vaccination against covid-19 has reduced deaths in Europe by at least 57% and saved at least 1.4 million lives, the World Health Organization has estimated. A preprint study by researchers from WHO/Europe reports that the known death toll from covid of 2.5 million in the WHO European Region could have been as high as four million without vaccines.1 The analysis of data from 34 countries also found that over 90% of lives saved were in people over 60.

The report includes country specific data showing that nations that implemented early vaccination programmes covering large parts of their population, such as Belgium, Denmark, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Malta, the Netherlands, and the UK, saw the greatest benefit in the overall number of lives saved through vaccination. The study found that covid vaccination had saved most lives during the period of the omicron variant from December 2021 to April 2023, with 700 000 deaths prevented.

As of 10 April 2023, a total of 50 648 deaths caused by ‘COVID vaccines’ had been reported in EudraVigilance – broken down by disease (heart conditions, central nervous system disorders, etc.). Why then, in the EMA’s latest report of 8 December 2022, is it stated that only 11 448 deaths were flagged and recorded in the EudraVigilance database?

The world health organization lol full of dodgy geezers.

 

[gant]

Because children are less likely to catch the virus.

Yeah that would be one way of pulling the wool over people's eyes.

 

[Odds]

or tinfoil hat, in your case.

Put your glasses on.

 

[noseall]

The world health organization lol full of dodgy geezers.

Yeah that would be one way of pulling the wool over people's eyes.

gant is now in full troll mode. Argument is shot.

 

[Notch7]

We’ve established there is some risk, whoever small it is already.

You can’t say “no risk”

So you admit the rabid conspiracists on here are just fear mongering anti vaxxers.

the risk from the vaccine is less than that from covid, always has been

 

[gant]

From YOUR link boyo.....

"...UK Government’s Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) advises that COVID vaccines should be offered to 5–11-year-old children in the UK, but also deems such immunisation as non-essential....."

Too difficult for you to understand?

Covid jab - safest medicine on the planet - FACT.

What that it's non essential.

 

[gant]

gant is now in full troll mode. Argument is shot.

Noseall on the squirm it would appear.

 

[Notch7]

What that it's non essential.

Non essential doesn’t mean not worthwhile.

 

[Notch7]

Noseall on the squirm it would appear.

No

you are

I wouldn’t walk past any vets this morning, all that foaming at the mouth they might give you a rabies jab

 

[gant]

Non essential doesn’t mean not worthwhile.

I thought zombie notch would read it like that.

 

[Odds]

Because children are less likely to catch the virus.

 

[gant]

But they can still catch it.

 

[noseall]

not in the kids best interests.

I clearly not the same as...

COVID vaccines should be offered to 5–11-year-old children in the UK

Only gant the troll would read it like that.

 

[Odds]

But they can still catch it.

Can they?
Not in such numbers to require a mandatory vaccine.