Almost certainly, after all beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
Absolutely. So far, nobody moaning about current vehicle styling, has posted up an image of a car that
they consider to be good looking, but chances are, not everyone would agree!
Because vehicle manufacturers have shareholders to satisfy & an extensive workforce to pay (they) design cars that the marketing dept. perceive will appeal to potential buyers. Fortunately for the manufs. those same buyers are far more gullible than they were back in my day & tend to put fashion ahead of practicality/build quality/longevity & have a greater disposable income with which to satisfy their egos.
Now I don't believe that for one minute!
We're as fickle as anyone when it comes to fashion. Look at the ridiculous fins on that Vauxhall, pretending to be American! No useful purpose whatsoever, just fashionable back in the day! And as far as longevity goes, few of them would live to see their 10th birthday!
I love my BM not only for it's shape/form but also the fact that it was designed by engineers, not accountants.
It's not really true though. That's part of the "spin" that the marketing guys and accountants put out to make the gullible think they're getting something unique. In reality, however,
all cars are designed by a mixture of engineers and stylists, (or "designers" as they'd call themselves) and the accountants and marketing men tell the engineers and stylists how much they're allowed to spend. If you want a car company genuinely run by engineers, Citroen in the 1950s and '60s is about as close an example as I can think of, but they went bust because they could make enough of a profit on their whacky products (which is why you need the accountant, unfortunately)! If you want engineer-led products these days, you need to go very niche and very expensive.