Government Rwanda plan ...

Sponsored Links
You don't need to be a clairvoyent to know to conclude that Boris was more likely lying, than not.
He'd been sacked twice before for lying, and he'd published Islamophobic comments.
Was he in the picture of being prime minister at the time of the vote.
The principle of Brexit was a good one, the only problem was/is the establishment don't want brexit so we got brino, not mays version but none the less a brino.
 
Was he in the picture of being prime minister at the time of the vote.
The principle of Brexit was a good one, the only problem was/is the establishment don't want brexit so we got brino, not mays version but none the less a brino.
He was the main man in the campaigning for Brexit. And he added colourful fake anecdotes and untruths.
 
Sponsored Links
He was the main man in the campaigning for Brexit. And he added colourful fake anecdotes and untruths.
So he wasn't prime minister at the time of the vote where if he was he could direct policy on Brexit.
Thanks for the confirmation.
 
Was he in the picture of being prime minister at the time of the vote.
The principle of Brexit was a good one, the only problem was/is the establishment don't want brexit so we got brino, not mays version but none the less a brino.

What principles of Brexit were a good one? So it's the stab-in-the-back myth.


List these principles.
 
Brexiteers are by default clairvoyants...


After all they told us ad nauseam they knew what they were voting for...

Thus they got what they wished for - chaos!
 
Last edited:
The main one is not obvious?
You govern yourself.
When it was first sold it was to be a trading shop, it then started to become increasingly clear we were sold a lie and it was to become much more.
The irony in all this is the generation who want instant gratification havent the wit or intelligence to give things time.
Germany and France have never seen eye to eye and needed Britain as a counter balance. Something they need now as relations between them are cool if not a little frosty.
Should imagine Starmer rather than take that opportunity to get easier trading relations, will lie at their feet and give away even more concessions to them being the puppet of the WEF he is.
 
When it was first sold it was to be a trading shop, it then started to become increasingly clear we were sold a lie and it was to become much more.

Or, without resorting to conspiracy theories, greater cooperation (beyond trading) was seen to be a better approach than going one's own way.
 
Or, without resorting to conspiracy theories, greater cooperation (beyond trading) was seen to be a better approach than going one's own way.

Cooperation doesn't have to mean being dictated to by Brussels...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I must be.
I stated that Brexit would be shît and that Boris would tell loads of lies. Nailed-on clairvoyant me.

Personally I don't find it ****, it's very much a matter of opinion
 
You don't need to be a clairvoyent to know to conclude that Boris was more likely lying, than not.
He'd been sacked twice before for lying, and he'd published Islamophobic comments.

What's Boris got to do with anything?

He wasn't PM when the referendum happened...
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top