- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 15,974
- Reaction score
- 2,275
- Country
Ok, where has that happened?
Government Rwanda plan ...
- Thread starter diy_fun_uk
- Start date
Sponsored Links
D
Deleted member 307320
Why do you think the processing rate is so low?
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 15,974
- Reaction score
- 2,275
- Country
Because the government are incompetent. They are in charge, stop blaming others for their failings.
D
Deleted member 307320
Sponsored Links
Well they weren’t on a go slow when the last Labour govt were in charge…..processsing rates were way way faster.
They arent on a go slow now, it’s the Tory govts decade + of austerity cutting home office staff and not investing in training.
You are just conveniently blaming the Civil Service not the Conservative govt, because the Daily Mail, have told you to think that way.
Yes it does.
asylum claims are processed by the home office, a govt department.
So the home office doesn't have civil servants working in the home office.
Everydays a school as they say.
Everydays a school as they say.
Just how many boats were arriving on our beaches daily/monthly/yearly when Labour were in charge?
He's comedy gold.
Tough asylum cases handled by new Home Office staff, say insiders
Several insiders tell BBC Two's Newsnight inexperienced and low-paid staff are handling applications.
www.bbc.co.uk
It is because of this:
TLDR: “The picture that emerges is of a government operation that has been systematically neglected and under-resourced for many years”
FULL QUOTE:
Slower Home Office decision-making
While part of the problem has been the increase in the numbers of people seeking asylum, a major contributor is the extraordinarily slow speed of Home Office civil servants in processing decisions. According to analysis by the Oxford Migration Observatory, an average staff member made just two decisions per month in the year ended March 2022, compared with eight per month in the year ending in March 2016. That represents a 75% fall in productivity. How can this be?Several factors have been suggested to explain this ultra-poor performance. They include inadequate staff training, low morale and high staff turnover due to lack of career progression and pressure to meet targets.
Writing in The Guardian in November 2022, Enver Solomon, CEO of the Refugee Council, states: “A year ago, concerted action was taken to recruit more caseworkers. But it takes at least a year from recruitment to training for a caseworker to be up to speed to do the job well. A plan should have been put in place well before the Covid pandemic when the backlog was already quickly growing. And it gets worse. Unbelievably, there hasn’t been a functional IT casework system. Decision-makers have been using spreadsheets.”
‘Inefficient and ineffective’
He quotes a report published in November 2021, in which the chief inspector of borders and immigration, David Neal, cited ‘inefficient’ and ‘ineffective’ workflow processes and an over-reliance on cumbersome Excel files. He adds it took a year for a decent IT system to be developed that is only now being put in place.Solomon sums up: “The picture that emerges is of a government operation that has been systematically neglected and under-resourced for many years
Why the Home Office is failing so dismally in processing asylum applications
John Cole examines the appalling asylum processing record of the Home Office and asks are the failures systemic or from the top?
yorkshirebylines.co.uk
In 2002 there were more asylum seeker claims than last year
oh and the processing RATE has slowed down
oh dear Gant and Mottie made to look silly again
“The annual number of asylum applications to the UK peaked in 2002 at 84,132.”
And more recently we have this:
”According to analysis by the Oxford Migration Observatory, an average staff member made just two decisions per month in the year ended March 2022, compared with eight per month in the year ending in March 2016. ”
You voted Conservative so take responsibility for it.
When in a hole stop digging so they say notchy.
Why have you answered mottie with no reference to the boats involved?
Why have you answered mottie with no reference to the boats involved?
Sponsored Links
Similar threads
