Hate Crime

  • Thread starter Deleted member 221031
  • Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah war and peace! No point/s made.

He’s had the audacity to claim @gant is protected by the mods
Someone was clearing up his mess so as to protect him from his own stupidity.
Same as Mottie, someone cleared up after him to save him from his own stupidity.
 
Sponsored Links
I have spoken to
Him on that particular forum he has never twigged who I was / am :cool:
Wow, that was so clever of you. But you choose to ignore them on this forum?
How can you tell it's the same person on both forums?
 
Yeah war and peace! No point/s made.

He’s had the audacity to claim @gant is protected by the mods

Oh take any notice of the fruit cake he has made all sorts of allegations of that type over the years

Probably holds the record for complaints ??
He reminds of that covid virus ?? Constantly evolving ???
 
Oh take any notice of the fruit cake he has made all sorts of allegations of that type over the years

Probably holds the record for complaints ??
He reminds of that covid virus ?? Constantly evolving ???
Says the poster who foments gratuitous violence, summary justice, capital punishment, war on its nearest neighbours, and some more distant ones.
The poster who demonstrates hatred against all foreigners and accuses many other posters of being liars.

And according to transam everybody else are the fruit cakes. :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
 
Sponsored Links
Oh take any notice of the fruit cake he has made all sorts of allegations of that type over the years

Probably holds the record for complaints ??
He reminds of that covid virus ?? Constantly evolving ???
Gant is probably the mod’s nightmare.

One question mark is enough Roy
 
Of course the label is assigned.
Do you think babies are born with the lable attached by some omnipotent being?

They're born with a cock or a fanny, possibly by some omnipotent being, possibly not, but that's what they're given nonetheless, and that's what determines their sex.
 
Well it isn't but does explain some of the thinking.
Sorry my typo dysphoria not dysmorphia.

Worth reading sec 3 - evidence and looking at the accepted practitioners and their field of expertise.
 
Irrelevant.


It allows them to gain a GRC, which allows them to change the 'sex' on their birth certificate.


As I've already said.
Under certain circumstance.


Under certain circumstances possibly, unless those women have a GRC, and changed their birth certificate, then it's no longer legal to exclude those women.


And?


Have you any details of this case of discrimination?
Who was the victim of this discrimination?
Who was responsible for this discrimination?
What were the reasons for this unlawful discrimination?

All discrimination covered by the Act, is unlawful.
Your assumptions are wrong. Trans person can be excluded even with a GRC. The act does not convey the rights that stonewall et al would like.
 
They're born with a cock or a fanny, possibly by some omnipotent being, possibly not, but that's what they're given nonetheless, and that's what determines their sex.
Do you understand the concept of "ambiguous genitalia"?
 
One in five thousand, you say, are ambiguous at birth and need further examination.

You deny that is "very occasionally?"
There are severl estimates out there.
Unsurprisingly, you chose one of the estimates with the lower figure. :rolleyes:

The prevalence of DSD is difficult to assess but may be not uncommon (1:2500–5000 live births), however as lesser number of DSD cases actually seek medical advice, it may point to the ignorance and the stigma associated with this condition.

Diagnosis of ambiguous genitalia a relatively new clinical practice which has only become normal and possible over the last 25 years, in developed countries.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
Back
Top