Someone was clearing up his mess so as to protect him from his own stupidity.
Same as Mottie, someone cleared up after him to save him from his own stupidity.
Someone was clearing up his mess so as to protect him from his own stupidity.
Wow, that was so clever of you. But you choose to ignore them on this forum?I have spoken to
Him on that particular forum he has never twigged who I was / am
Says the poster who foments gratuitous violence, summary justice, capital punishment, war on its nearest neighbours, and some more distant ones.Oh take any notice of the fruit cake he has made all sorts of allegations of that type over the years
Probably holds the record for complaints ??
He reminds of that covid virus ?? Constantly evolving ???
Gant is probably the mod’s nightmare.Oh take any notice of the fruit cake he has made all sorts of allegations of that type over the years
Probably holds the record for complaints ??
He reminds of that covid virus ?? Constantly evolving ???
Of course the label is assigned.
Do you think babies are born with the lable attached by some omnipotent being?
Sorry my typo dysphoria not dysmorphia.Well it isn't but does explain some of the thinking.
Your assumptions are wrong. Trans person can be excluded even with a GRC. The act does not convey the rights that stonewall et al would like.Irrelevant.
It allows them to gain a GRC, which allows them to change the 'sex' on their birth certificate.
As I've already said.
Under certain circumstance.
Under certain circumstances possibly, unless those women have a GRC, and changed their birth certificate, then it's no longer legal to exclude those women.
And?
Have you any details of this case of discrimination?
Who was the victim of this discrimination?
Who was responsible for this discrimination?
What were the reasons for this unlawful discrimination?
All discrimination covered by the Act, is unlawful.
You're grasping at straws now,
Do you understand the concept of "ambiguous genitalia"?They're born with a cock or a fanny, possibly by some omnipotent being, possibly not, but that's what they're given nonetheless, and that's what determines their sex.
There are severl estimates out there.One in five thousand, you say, are ambiguous at birth and need further examination.
You deny that is "very occasionally?"
The prevalence of DSD is difficult to assess but may be not uncommon (1:2500–5000 live births), however as lesser number of DSD cases actually seek medical advice, it may point to the ignorance and the stigma associated with this condition.
The act does not convey the rights that stonewall et al would like.
Strawman arguments.Being hyperspadic does not make you a woman.
Then you'll be able to cite a case of this ocurring?Trans person can be excluded even with a GRC.
Unsurprisingly, you chose one of the estimates with the lower figure.