I see you are both intent on getting this thread closed as well.
Instead of participating with intelligent contributions, you seek to have the thread closed.
Is that because it's beyond your intellectual capability?
Last edited:
- Status
Instead of participating with intelligent contributions, you seek to have the thread closed.
Is that because it's beyond your intellectual capability?
Sponsored Links
D
Deleted member 221031
You’ve supported nothing and no one has agreed with a single post!
Even the wombels aren’t onboard.
D
Deleted member 221031
No I’m just pointing out that you ramble on more than the rest of us combined. And not a single person has yet to agree.
As I thought, apart from the plethora of articles, studies, research papers, and real life data that I have presented in support of my arguments, there have been about eigth or nine other instances of links to other articles, posted by about six posters. None of which was JohnD's, he presented nothing but slogans and disingenuous assumptions.
Of the eight or nine instances of other linked aticles, two of them were memes or giffs, from Brigadier and Odds, of no particular value, IIRC.
One was the OP's. two were innocuous articles, from Securespark and Denso13, IIRC.
Two of them were articles about J K Rowling which is linked to the topic, but not really contributing anything to the discussion, posted by Dork Lard.
IIRC there were two posted links by motorbiking, one about Suella Braverman positioning herslef to the right of Genghis Khan, and the other an article from the Guardian. I specifically asked him for a case to support one of his claims, but there was nothing.
Sponsored Links
D
Deleted member 221031
Quoting yourself! That’s so narcissistic it’s just unbelievable.
D
Deleted member 221031
0.044% of your posts are liked. That’s all you need to know.
7 Scientists whose ideas were rejected during their lifetimes
We've all had ideas - some good, some not so good. I can't begin to imagine how hair-pullingly frustrating it must be to hatch a brilliant new idea, believe passionately that it's right, then find everyone else ignoring you, or telling you that you're wrong, or even mocking you. Worse still...
www.famousscientists.org
Being a lone voice does not indicate that one is wrong.
I can understand how many on here are subject to group thought, especially when it's based on prejudice, lies and myths.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/investing19-5bfc2b8f4cedfd0026c1194c.jpg)
What Is Groupthink? Definition, Characteristics, and Causes
Groupthink is a phenomenon in which a group of individuals come to a consensus without critical reasoning or considering the consequences or alternatives.
I'm not a populist. Are you?
At least I put my points in the right place.
I hope you don't need maths in your profession!
Oh Roy, you are silly.
You've made a habit of falsely claiming what you think I believe
And what you think Mrs Rowling believes.
Have you no shame?
Did he answer that?
Why not?
Because they aren't the same thing.
So why do you keep pretending to think they are?
It's clear from your persistent use of slogans, lack of supporting evidence and ad hominem and strawman arguments that you believe in gender essentialism: "the doctrine that there are two distinct sexes, male and female, created by God, and that individuals are immutably one or the other."
You wish to deny the existence of trans gender people. You at least want to deny them their rights enshrined in law.
The slight difference between JK Rowling and you is that she is outspoken about her beliefs, whereas you only skirt around the issue without coming out and stating what it is that you believe.
It's clear from your persistent posting of lies and misrepresentations that you are hoping to make a case you know to be wrong.
- Status
Sponsored Links
