S
sodthisforfun
No need - you answered motor's question. Well, not really, you didn't answer...Dear God!
Talk about going round in circles.
Reread the whole thread!
No need - you answered motor's question. Well, not really, you didn't answer...Dear God!
Talk about going round in circles.
Reread the whole thread!
Really. Your original post, in it's original form, and in totality:You said 'according to me'.
Well it wasnt, I merely reported what the police chief said.
I can't quite make out the quotes or the source of your quotes.Could you please point out where they are?Certainly the UK knew about this girl but did not take safeguarding steps -for example not warning the parents.
I feel sorry for the parents -whatever one thinks about the girl, the parents have lost a child.
If they had wanted volunteers, certainly.@ban-all-sheds Would you have volunteered to go and collect the child as a representative of the British Government?
Again your point has been answered several times over. But it won't stop you asking it again and again and again.I doubt anyone would've prevented them leaving, but where would they have gone? Are they allowed to enter another country without a passport?
And where do these UK officials come from? There is no active British officials in Syria.
And can criminals arrested abroad or deportation back to the UK escape that fate by the simple expedient of destroying their passports?How do mothers and babies travel after their children are born while abroad?
That remains to be determined.She isn't a UK citizen.
Go on then - show how selective it is being by showing where I've done what you accuse me of.Oh you do have selective memory
Is that a failing?and a great way with words
No.just like Himmy. You the same person?
Who are "we"?Yes but we did not want her in the UK
When she first surfaced he should have worked with whatever other agencies were appropriate to provide as much assistance as possible to them out there and to get her repatriated.According to those who think the Home Secretary should have done more to secure the protection of the child. What should he have done?
I know we are doing our best to sever friendly relations with as many countries as possible, but the job is not yet complete, and I think you'll find that there is quite a difference between someone passport-less rocking up unannounced at a port of entry, and someone expected and pre-arranged arriving accompanied by UK government officials.I doubt anyone would've prevented them leaving, but where would they have gone? Are they allowed to enter another country without a passport?
How about from the UK?And where do these UK officials come from?
Is there an active Daily Mail office in Syria?There is no active British officials in Syria.
Himmie still hasnt provided any answers.Dear God!
Talk about going round in circles.
Reread the whole thread!
Again your point has been answered several times over. But it won't stop you asking it again and again and again.
It takes hours to make out an emergency passport.
How do you think new born babies are normally allowed to travel when born abroad?
It doesn't need a passport to travel to a local hospital.
And before you claim that the hospitals had been bombed, yes some had, in the west of Syria, not in the NE, where Shemima was, which was in Kurdish territory, allies of the Syrian Defence Force.
They are hardly likely to bomb their allies.
I am pleased to see you have realised your error..... finally.I can't quite make out the quotes or the source of your quotes.Could you please point out where they are?
AAF.I am pleased to see you have realised your error..... finally.