I was in a Hezbollah tunnel

[JohnD]

It's a lovely story of course, but only serves to enforce the need for a jewish homeland. Look, you can hate jews as m8uch as you like, I don't care, you can deny their right to a homeland as much as you want, I don't care.

But make no mistake, you have a hatred for Jews and you are conflating more and more to disguise that.

Be honest, you don't like jews, and you support terrorism.

If I felt the same way, I'd have the honesty to admit it.

You hate Palestinians and deny their right to their homeland

Because you are a racist and support genocide.

 

[Munroast]

They have no right to exist. They are thieves of Palestine, Syria and other countries. So no - they don't have a right to "fight back". The Zionist entity is the terrorist state.

so what would you do with the Israelies ?

or do you like to dehumanise them and think of them as sausages?

 

[Munroast]

You hate Palestinians and deny their right to their homeland

Because you are a racist and support genocide.

I wish we could do a big swap - all the Israelies could come and live in the UK (that would get our economy going) and all the UK hamas/palastine flag wavers could all go there and live happily ever after - and please take all your diversity inclusivity and brexit with you, and do remember to take along starmer and lineiker.

then we would all be happy.

 

[fillyboy]

You hate Palestinians and deny their right to their homeland

Because you are a racist and support genocide.

The Palestinians have rejected their own rights to a homeland, they were offered it in UN resolution 181. Grow up John, your childish accusations are becoming boring.

 

[Risteard]

so what would you do with the Israelies ?

or do you like to dehumanise them and think of them as sausages?

No such thing. There are some Jewish Palestinians (though certainly not all Jews are Palestinian). Palestinian Jews obviously have a home in Palestine.

Zionism is anti-Jewish and is a cancer.

Palestine is Palestine, from the river to the sea.

England had no right to give it to foreign Zionists.

I recognise only Palestine.

 

[fillyboy]

No such thing. There are some Jewish Palestinians (though certainly not all Jews are Palestinian). Palestinian Jews obviously have a home in Palestine.

Zionism is anti-Jewish and is a cancer.

Palestine is Palestine, from the river to the sea.

England had no right to give it to foreign Zionists.

I recognise only Palestine.

Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you, a complete and utter ****ing nutter. Enjoy.

 

[Risteard]

Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you, a complete and utter ****ing nutter. Enjoy.

Just a human.

 

[Mrs Ten Names]

It's a lovely story of course, but only serves to enforce the need for a jewish homeland.

How does it serve the ideology that Jews need a homeland?
They were content before the wars with a Jewish Diaspora throughout the globe.
After the WW many chose not to return to their adopted homes, even though they were offered that right.
Instead they wanted to migrate to Palestine, encouraged by the global Zionist movement.
But many were also content to return to their homeland, or to be repatriated elsewhere.

Look, you can hate jews as m8uch as you like,

Resort to offensive abuse again, because the ability for sensible discussion has eluded you.

I don't care, you can deny their right to a homeland as much as you want, I don't care.

I don't, I'm criticising the mechanism by which it was attained, is being defended and is being extended.
It was ill thought out and created the current conflict which has been raging ever since, at the cost of immeasurable suffering.
I'm also criticising the double standards displayed by the USA, etc.

But make no mistake, you have a hatred for Jews and you are conflating more and more to disguise that.
Be honest, you don't like jews, and you support terrorism.

More offensive abuse.

If I felt the same way, I'd have the honesty to admit it.

You make a claim to honesty after comments like those above.
Your claim belongs in the joke forum.

 

[Mrs Ten Names]

They have no right to exist. They are thieves of Palestine, Syria and other countries.

That does not deny them 'a right to exist'.
You could temper your comment by saying that Israel has no legal right to exist, but your comment, as it stands, is potentially probably anti-Semitic.
I have previously stated that a fair perception of the creation of Israel is that it was born out of violent conflict, sustained by violent conflict, and is being expanded through violent conflict.
But this was obvious to many way back in 1947, during the UN discussion and passing of the UN Resolution 181.

So no - they don't have a right to "fight back".

Despite the questionable birth of Israel and its questionable legitimacy, people have a right to defend themselves.
Unfortunately the UN (the collection of the 51 nation states at the time) created the mess, despite the warnings of many.
Similarly, Palestinians have a right to resist the occupation of their homeland, (Including the current occupation of Gaza and the West Bank).
But Might is Right, unfortunately and against all moral values.

The Zionist entity is the terrorist state.

Zionism is an aggressive ideology pursuing the occupation of the whole of Transjordan, through whatever means is at their disposal.
Currently the Israeli government is dominated by Zionists.

 

[Nwgs2]

UN Resolution 181, also known as the **United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine**, was adopted by the UN General Assembly on **November 29, 1947**. It called for the partition of the British Mandate of Palestine into two separate states, one Jewish and one Arab, with Jerusalem placed under international administration due to its religious significance.

Key points offered in UN Resolution 181 include:

1. **Partition of Palestine**: The plan divided Palestine into two states:
- **Jewish State**: Approximately 55% of the land, though the Jewish population made up about one-third of the total population at the time.
- **Arab State**: Around 45% of the land, designated for the Arab population, who were the majority in Palestine.

2. **Jerusalem as an International City**: Jerusalem and its surrounding areas, including Bethlehem, were to be placed under a special international regime, administered by the UN, to protect the religious interests of Jews, Christians, and Muslims.

3. **Economic Union**: Despite the political partition, the two states were to maintain an economic union, sharing currency, customs, transportation, and other key infrastructure.

4. **Timetable for Implementation**: The plan called for a staged withdrawal of British forces and the establishment of the two independent states, which were to come into existence no later than October 1, 1948.

The **Jewish leadership** accepted the plan, though reluctantly due to compromises on territory and the international status of Jerusalem. The **Arab leaders** and neighboring Arab states rejected it, arguing that it unfairly favored the Jewish minority and violated the rights of the Arab majority.

The rejection of the plan by the Arab side led to the **1948 Arab-Israeli War** following Israel's declaration of independence in May 1948.

 

[Mrs Ten Names]

Fortunately Risteard, most people recognise you as a complete nutjob. Jog on.

He is entitled to an opinion. If you disagree with his opinion, there is always the option of sensible debate.

 

[Mrs Ten Names]

You hate Palestinians and deny their right to their homeland

Because you are a racist and support genocide.

I suspect filly would support the Thanos if they were anti-Muslim.

 

[Mrs Ten Names]

UN Resolution 181, also known as the **United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine**, was adopted by the UN General Assembly on **November 29, 1947**. It called for the partition of the British Mandate of Palestine into two separate states, one Jewish and one Arab, with Jerusalem placed under international administration due to its religious significance.

Key points offered in UN Resolution 181 include:

1. **Partition of Palestine**: The plan divided Palestine into two states:
- **Jewish State**: Approximately 55% of the land, though the Jewish population made up about one-third of the total population at the time.
- **Arab State**: Around 45% of the land, designated for the Arab population, who were the majority in Palestine.

2. **Jerusalem as an International City**: Jerusalem and its surrounding areas, including Bethlehem, were to be placed under a special international regime, administered by the UN, to protect the religious interests of Jews, Christians, and Muslims.

3. **Economic Union**: Despite the political partition, the two states were to maintain an economic union, sharing currency, customs, transportation, and other key infrastructure.

4. **Timetable for Implementation**: The plan called for a staged withdrawal of British forces and the establishment of the two independent states, which were to come into existence no later than October 1, 1948.

The **Jewish leadership** accepted the plan, though reluctantly due to compromises on territory and the international status of Jerusalem. The **Arab leaders** and neighboring Arab states rejected it, arguing that it unfairly favored the Jewish minority and violated the rights of the Arab majority.

The rejection of the plan by the Arab side led to the **1948 Arab-Israeli War** following Israel's declaration of independence in May 1948.

You are still failing to provide your sources of reference.
For all we know, you could have made all this up.

 

[Risteard]

That does not deny them 'a right to exist'.
You could temper your comment by saying that Israel has no right to exist, but your comment, as it stands, is potentially probably anti-Semitic.
I have previously stated that a fair perception of the creation of Israel is that it was born out of violent conflict, sustained by violent conflict, and is being expanded through violent conflict.
But this was obvious to many way back in 1947, during the UN discussion and passing of the UN Resolution 181.


Despite the questionable birth of Israel and its questionable legitimacy, people have a right to defend themselves.
Unfortunately the UN (the collection of the 51 nation states at the time) created the mess, despite the warnings of many.
Similarly, Palestinians have a right to resist the occupation of their homeland, (Including the current occupation of Gaza and the West Bank).
But Might is Right, unfortunately and against all moral values.


Zionism is an aggressive ideology pursuing the occupation of the whole of Transjordan, through whatever means is at their disposal.
Currently the Israeli government is dominated by Zionists.

No it isn't. Arabs are Semites.

 

[Nwgs2]

You are still failing to provide your sources of reference.
For all we know, you could have made all this up.

Sorry about that, I keep forgetting.