Yacht varnish.He really ought to cut down on that glue.
Yacht varnish.He really ought to cut down on that glue.
So you don't need to find extra work for them then.
You do understand what a decent wage means?
Fantasy land. Probably the yacht varnish.I'll try not to be rude, because I think, you are really close to getting it. But I may be wrong.
Nobody is saying they should take on extra work. Though in the original example of the Nurse I did show how they could increase their income by 30% by working 2 extra days a month.
In the example of the care worker [and the same applies to someone employed as a cleaner or many similar low paid roles.. The approach is as follows:
A works 35 hours per week as a home help / care worker via agency/employer normally on a flexible hours scheme.
£12 * 35 = £420 a week and just under £22k per year.
A finds 2 private clients and does 2-2.5 hours per week for each. So 5 hours at £18 p/h
now they earn an extra £1,400 or so a year more (allowing for holidays). If they charge £20 even better given that the agency charges £30 minimum
Get someone not off his tits on evostik to tell you that I advocate limiting the amount of tax concessions.
Yacht varnish.
I didn't expect you to understand.. Maybe yourFantasy land. Probably the yacht varnish.
well thats kinda what they do. Just like 90% of the populationI like the fantasy that nobody needs to be low paid, they should just earn more money.
how about we stop giving multi-millionaire pensioners tax concessions, and tell them if they're feeling a bit short, they should just go out and earn some more money.
You think people struggling don’t already work extra jobs?I'll try not to be rude, because I think, you are really close to getting it. But I may be wrong.
Nobody is saying they should take on extra work. Though in the original example of the Nurse I did show how they could increase their income by 30% by working 2 extra days a month.
In the example of the care worker [and the same applies to someone employed as a cleaner or many similar low paid roles.. The approach is as follows:
A works 35 hours per week as a home help / care worker via agency/employer normally on a flexible hours scheme.
£12 * 35 = £420 a week and just under £22k per year.
A finds 2 private clients and does 2-2.5 hours per week for each. So 5 hours at £18 p/h
now they earn an extra £1,400 or so a year more (allowing for holidays). If they charge £20 even better given that the agency charges £30 minimum
No they don’t the wealthy buy more assetswell thats kinda what they do. Just like 90% of the population
and nothing in my proposal involves anyone working extra hours..You think people struggling don’t already work extra jobs?
In the real world people have children or elderly parents or disabled to look after.
One of the points I wanted to make. The link includes suggestions about bringing it back. There are also comments about NHS staff behaviour.But some of this upfront give-away will be recouped later, as the people saving more in a pension in response to the reform will pay more tax on their pension income in future.
The issue is do you:
- Increase the minimum wage with all the downsides that brings
- Invest in helping people realise their potential.
The original Labour LTA with inflation would mean the cap would be about £2.5M today.. thats probably an index linked pension of about £60k or £80k with some risk. A typical senior public sector employee would have a similar defined benefits pension. To be fair it was the Conservatives that squeezed it and made its stupidly complex. Hunt probably went to far the other way in trying to fix it.One of the points I wanted to make. The link includes suggestions about bringing it back. There are also comments about NHS staff behaviour.
What will Labour choose to do - bring it back but in what over all way? Starmer says he doesn't mind people being rich but it has to said he does have an interest in methods of avoiding tax.
I think that is almost impossible to do. Not the building houses bit, but the reducing the cost of living.You missed out:
- reduce the cost of living: for instance, by increasing the available housing stock, and therefore reducing / removing housings' attractive level of return-on-investment.
Not the building houses bit, but the reducing the cost of living.
I think that is almost impossible to do.