Is there an underground movement to get threads removed?

[enyam]

Why isn't there a "who the f**k cares all the posts on here that get deleted are authored by retarded donuts with less braincells than a goldfish as are most of the repliers so why don't you all f**k off to another forum where you can post your racist homophobic drivel in bliss" option?

Why not edit it and put one in.

 

[ajstoneservices]

+1 what he said. kin mod's taking the pi55.

 

[ImayKnow]

'******' - that is a word often used by the biggest ****** on here, the one and only joe90.

 

[gregers]

Sorry I don't know what the pm bit is, I don't use it.

Robin Hoods as you possibly know are kit cars. Google RHOCar.

Green Lane is for off roaders. Google GLASS (Green Lane Association).

They may be of interest to you.

1 no i didnt
2 had an inkling.
but thanx if i get the time ill check em out.

if you go to your profile and allow pm's then you should be able to receive private messages.

 

[LastMagicBean]

why don't you all f**k off to another forum where you can post your racist homophobic drivel in bliss" option?

Gayness isn't often discussed. That would be an interesting one.

 

[Sombrero]

Some of the mods will remove posts and say why.... others just kill off a seemingly good thread without explanation...

But it's the owners rules, not ours!!!

 

[gregers]

Some of the mods will remove posts and say why.... others just kill off a seemingly good thread without explanation...

But it's the owners rules, not ours!!!

mmm maybe,but it comes down to the individual's point of view.
the site owner admin is not on here 24/7.so he has employed a certain number of mods to do his work so to speak.

all forums have an A.U.P and us as members have agreed by them upon signing up to said forum/s.
the trouble with this is,if you were to follow this to the letter of the forum law,you would not have hardly any kind of general chat,and that would have to moderated in real time.saying that,it has been proven that some members are allowed to get away with abuse far more then others,we as members have to ask why this is allowed,
it then comes full circle and doesnt take long to work out who is a mod or not.and if not then WHY are they allowed to do it?????

 

[JBR]

Some of the mods will remove posts and say why.... others just kill off a seemingly good thread without explanation...

But it's the owners rules, not ours!!!

I agree. There seems to be no rhyme or reason to it.

What appear to me to be genuine and structured arguments about 'certain subjects' are removed, whilst at the same time some really quite rude name-calling (a lot actually) is left alone. This sort of thing is bound to stifle interesting debate.

But as you say, it's the owners' rules.

 

[Sombrero]

But as you say, it's the owners' rules.

Hmm interesting... you suggest more than one owner:

"owners rules" - carp grammar (by me)
"owner's rules" - correct grammar for one owner
"owners' rules" - correct grammar for multiple owners (by you) !!

 

[LastMagicBean]

then comes full circle and doesnt take long to work out who is a mod or not

One more comment and I'll ban ya.

 

[Sombrero]

then comes full circle and doesnt take long to work out who is a mod or not

One more comment and I'll ban ya.

I'd ban you bean, but I've bean told not to !!!

 

[LastMagicBean]

then comes full circle and doesnt take long to work out who is a mod or not

One more comment and I'll ban ya.

I'd ban you bean, but I've bean told not to !!!

I wouldn't ban anyone. I like everybody.

 

[gregers]

yeah ok,like i care.
i would do what a lot of the other so called banned peeps do,
join under a proxy.

 

[JBR]

But as you say, it's the owners' rules.

Hmm interesting... you suggest more than one owner:

"owners rules" - carp grammar (by me)
"owner's rules" - correct grammar for one owner
"owners' rules" - correct grammar for multiple owners (by you) !!

Well, I wouldn't know, but I'm assuming it is owned by more than one person. If it is only one person, they've taken on a lot.

 

[Sombrero]

But as you say, it's the owners' rules.

Hmm interesting... you suggest more than one owner:

"owners rules" - carp grammar (by me)
"owner's rules" - correct grammar for one owner
"owners' rules" - correct grammar for multiple owners (by you) !!

Well, I wouldn't know, but I'm assuming it is owned by more than one person. If it is only one person, they've taken on a lot.

If nothing else, a rowdy bunch of mods..... wouldn't want to be at that Chrimbo party ..... (assuming they're of the christian bent...!)..