Israel uses starvation as a weapon of war, say Israeli sources.

According to Himmy post 45 and liked by Odds, so I assume he agrees.
Bull ****ter has resorted to blatant lies.
My post #45:
Thanks.
I have noticed that Motorbiking tends to be obtuse when he is on uncertain territory.
He will state his interpretation of something, but he will refuse to present the genuine article.
He relies on the laziness of the reader to not check his facts. Understandable considering some on here refuse to read further than the first sentence.
Either that or he has lost the ability to read numbers. Which would probably be a real indication of his belief that he avoided paying VAT.
This is a perfect example of Bull ****ter stating something and relying on the laziness of others not to scrutinise his claims.
1729240493917.png
 
Sponsored Links
Unlike you, I’ve only ever had one username.
Unlike you, I don’t get frequently banned from the forum and reincarnate myself under a new username.

Do you seriously think anyone believes you are a new user from Holland.
 
Didn't take long for the thread to swerve from the title to a subject that doesn't relate. There are some factors that do.

Used to be 500 trucks a day. Really needs breaking down as some were commercial. It also appears that some similar went out. Now however Israel's damage to arable land has to be considered. Not all but rather a lot of it.

Starvation related comments from Gov's, UN and NGO's. Rather long periods of warning how dire this is but short of starvation for adults anyway. That can only be arranged by managing the amount that goes in. Medical aspects have fallen short for a long time now. This area needs working hospitals that can use them.

Queues at the boarder have caused a problem with perishables. At one stage a Norwegian aid worker gave his young son some yoghurt. First time ever he had tasted it. Want to save on your shopping bill? Easy use a Gaza diet buy plenty of flour. Water comes out of the tap here so no need to queue, You may find a source of past their best veg which could help further with costs. Black market. Maybe foodbanks keep some.West bank - may have water and electricity. If IDF comes along repair after they have left. Sewage if ripped up more difficult. The others are the norm. Roads as well. Diet here probably somewhat better.

Aid delivery. The network is messed up. Desperate people, black market aspects and the available distribution points make it more difficult. As does any iDF military activity. Pauses aren't on. The Gaza reception buildings near the Rafar crossing have been flattened.

Blinken's letter and also a security council hearing has demanded certain actions by Israel. The deadline date is after the US elections. Interesting as there has been a feeling that the US will interfere post the election. Prior may influence votes. Benjamin has made this point several times. The reason for the demands is certain political comments about methods of continuing the war. More trucks have gone in - US point of view is need to watch carefully. I assume to see where it is actually going. They often get stuck. LOL Israel has mentioned that.

Benjamin's current comments - apart from aid continue according to plan. End game doesn't even seem to include a reformed PA. That's the IDF's job? They wont be getting out of Gaza.

Lebanon appears to be more difficult than Gaza but appears to be shaping up in the same way as lots more bomb runs. One arms dump was hit in Beirut. Size - no way of knowing but the fireworks didn't last long and not that spectacular. Another just showed a metal parts of a mortar in the rubble. Big bombs used here which are damaging surrounding buildings.

Iran - for some reason the US has decided to improve Israel's surface to air defences against ballistics. Iran is seeking an Islamic solution to the whole mess including Gaza etc. The end game of that doesn't appear to get any where near what the Arab states want to see.
 
Interesting change. I've watched AlJ on the TV at times for years, Often more world news and sometimes a different slant. Obviously I watch it regularly thanks to the current war. Info back up often crops up on our own channels.

They recently changed the freeview channel number to 251. Seems to be a data channel so TV needs net access. I'm wondering why. At times I get drop out until the route sorts itself out. Easiest way on my TV is to reselect it.
 
Sponsored Links
Unlike you, I’ve only ever had one username.
Unlike you, I don’t get frequently banned from the forum and reincarnate myself under a new username.

Do you seriously think anyone believes you are a new user from Holland.
I really do not care what people believe, especially when their belief relies on their bigotry, embarrassment or hatred.
I award the respect of addressing or referring to people by their preferred name or pronoun. You assign your choice of username according to your preference, and in order to make the discussion personal.
You demonstrably do not have the same respect for others, so you do not deserve the same reciprocal respect. I will use the name, for you, that I think best suits you.
As you have been shown to be a bull ****ter, it would be appropriate.
 
I really do not care what people believe, especially when their belief relies on their bigotry, embarrassment or hatred.
I award the respect of addressing or referring to people by their preferred name or pronoun. You assign your choice of username according to your preference, and in order to make the discussion personal.
You demonstrably do not have the same respect for others, so you do not deserve the same reciprocal respect. I will use the name, for you, that I think best suits you.
As you have been shown to be a bull ****ter, it would be appropriate.

And he buys yachts VAT free. Brexit bonus. (y)
 
Dare say transam is continuing with his usual disinformation campaign, driven by his Islamophobia.

Dare day T & G will continue with his usual porkie pies :giggle:

It’s himmy again under another ID ???

Oh well bung the fruit cake on ignore

My entire ignore list are all the same person :giggle:
Tis done ignored the fruit cake
 
Post 92 has the definition according to Himmy. He claims they are a religious movement, odds agrees and further refers to them as religious zealots. Based on those definitions s29a applies. You will see the links to sec 17 and 29a. You will see the links go to the actual statute. Not the guardian, not Facebook but the actual law. Click it, read it. It’s not even a paragraph.

Miller carefully defined his version of Zionism to avoid crossing the line.

You claimed the law says something that it doesn't.

I can see you are embarrassed at being shown up.

Try to quote the sentence that you claim exists.
 
Here we go on JohnDs merry go round...

According to you stirring hatred against a religious group is illegal yes or no?
 
Last edited:
Here we go on JohnDs merry go round...

According to you stirring hatred against a religions group is illegal yes or no?

He is a member ? Or affiliated to a certain section of a political party ? That don’t like Israelis / Jews def momentum ( ;) ) in that view imo

His fair weather freind Corbyn attended a few dodgy funerals / meetings back
In the day ???
 
Here we go on JohnDs merry go round...

According to you stirring hatred against a religious group is illegal yes or no?

That is not a claim I have made.

Your habit of making untrue statements is quite noticeable.
 
You claimed the law says something that it doesn't.

I can see you are embarrassed at being shown up.

Try to quote the sentence that you claim exists.

Motorbiking is, of course, unable to do that.

Because what he wrote is not true.

Stirring hatred towards Zionists is not protected, because they meet the definition of a race, in the public order act, particularly using the above example.

No they don't
 
If you define them as a "religious group" or "religious zealots" or anything that meets the definition of religion or race as defined by s17 or 29a of the public order act then you are clearly recognising them as such. of course Dr. Miller was smarter and made up his own definition.

tell me

According to you stirring hatred against a religious group or race is illegal yes or no?

its a simple question. Do you need help? You will find the Answer in the Public Order Act.
That is not a claim I have made.

Your habit of making untrue statements is quite noticeable.
Odd how you refuse to answer the question. You do not need to fear entrapment. There is no obligation to show mens rea.
 
Last edited:
Sponsored Links
Back
Top