Aww bless, lobbing a few crumbs at the peasants...
While taking their money and making them poorer.
While taking their money and making them poorer.
Are you trying to say that monarchy is based on civility?
Lots of notable omissions there. The truth, the partial truth and nothing but the worst examples you can think of.
Off the top of my head, you conveniently omitted France and Germany.
Almost all modern countries elect their leaders,
Does someone actually believe this?So do we.
Unless it has escaped your attention, we are a constitutional monarchy. Ceremonial only, in all reality.
Does someone actually believe this?
There isn't much to stop the monarch dabbling in all political business, and their meddling isn't even recorded. We've had a queen that understood the sensitivity of this and voluntarily stood back most of the time (that we know of anyway). But this was largely her choice - she could have been much more involved if she'd wanted and nothing would have stopped her.
I very much doubt Charles is going to behave the same way, he has a long history of meddling in all kinds of issues both overtly and covertly, e.g. this sort of thing...
Prince Charles's 'black spider memos' show lobbying at highest political level
Publication of 27 letters after 10-year legal battle shows heir to the throne petitioning ministers on subjects from the Iraq war to alternative therapieswww.theguardian.com
Hopefully Charles will be a gift for the republic movement, it looks like much of the commonwealth will ditch him as their head of state for starters. Perhaps this and whatever he does here will start to turn the previously neutral majority towards the idea of modernising our system.
Why shouldn't he get involved in politics? The monarch is the highest political power in the country. All bills must have "Royal Assent", which is seen as a formality and is always passed, and the monarch can dissolve parliament. But, if we had a more active, patriotic and caring monarch who used this power it could be the answer to all our problems. This is why I support the institution of monarchy. I don't expect much of Charles, but if a charismatic person were to take the reigns, and garner enough public support, the King could rule again.There isn't much to stop the monarch dabbling in all political business,
You do talk utter rubbish!In the short time since Tony Blair became lifetime ruler of the United Kingdom
I think it was Murphy esq. doing his talking by that time...You do talk utter rubbish!
You are blaming subsequent Governments' decisions on a past PM?
Virtually everyone in authority over us is unelected. Who voted for Ritchie Sunak? Did you vote for lockdowns; power station demolitions: mass immigration; hyperinflation etc etc? By choice I would not give money to any of those things.
You've not really thought that one through have you.Why shouldn't he get involved in politics? The monarch is the highest political power in the country. All bills must have "Royal Assent", which is seen as a formality and is always passed, and the monarch can dissolve parliament. But, if we had a more active, patriotic and caring monarch who used this power it could be the answer to all our problems. This is why I support the institution of monarchy. I don't expect much of Charles, but if a charismatic person were to take the reigns, and garner enough public support, the King could rule again.
GOD SAVE THE KING!
That made me laugh.You've not really thought that one through have you.
The last Monarch called Charles who tried the above got his head chopped orf.the monarch can dissolve parliament