You are the one who put them together.
I didn't put them together. I argued that history can be taught without re-enacting it, especially when re-enacting it is likely to cause a reaction.
I specifically said:
Incidents can be discussed without the need to repeat them?
History does not need to be re-enacted to learn about it.Charlie Hebdo is part of France's history. At the time of the original murders and those storming the offices of the magazine, freedom of speech was talked about then.
If a FRENCH teacher wishes to teach in FRANCE about what happened in FRANCE's history then that should be able to happen without having your head hacked off in the street. This is what freedom of speech is in France - or do you not realise what it means?