What's actually happened isn't that dramatic at all.All of this is what happens when you choose front row politicians because they're a poster boy for the CRE and to humour nut jobs like Ex Himmy.
I'm guessing all the recent turmoil could have been avoided if the Tories chose Sunak?
. Pension funds found themselves on the wrong side of swaps they entered into to manage their liabilities
. They were margin called and didn't have the readies to cover their margins.
. They began selling their safe assets - Gilts.
. Prices dropped as supply outstripped demand
. More problems for pension funds.
. BoE stepped in to sort it out - that's their job.
If you can find a better argument against privatising pension provision I'd like to see it.
Sunak probably wouldn't have promoted the same policy as Truss/Kwarteng, he's more your head-on austerity type i.e. "balance the books", "fiscal responsibility" etc.
What Truss should have done is said something like "In 3/6/12 months we will stop issuing Treasury Bills and Gilts, deal with it." but, as ever, the backers made her buckle; they didn't want to give up all that free, guaranteed money.