- Joined
- 11 Dec 2012
- Messages
- 1,770
- Reaction score
- 470
- Country
Drugs will never be eradicated, so if there’s better control on them, why not ?
Lets legalise knives, hand guns, assault rifles etc etc....better control will make things ok!!!
Drugs will never be eradicated, so if there’s better control on them, why not ?
No, that's conflating things.Lets legalise knives, hand guns, assault rifles etc etc....better control will make things ok!!!
I understand what you’re saying, but certain US states are making it work.Lets legalise knives, hand guns, assault rifles etc etc....better control will make things ok!!!
Knives, guns, rifles etc are already heavily controlled and licensed.Lets legalise knives, hand guns, assault rifles etc etc....better control will make things ok!!!
Surprised and not surprised at the pro canabis lobby, younger generation seem to be taking drugs more than any generation before. The idea that all weed would be legalised is crazy, there's strong eidence that stronger stuff causes schizprhenia. The importers/dealers would make the illicit stuff more attractive, and crime levels would be maintained. I know the libertarian right wing thinks its a mater of personal choice, but far from legalising it, I would treat end users as criminals on the same basis as the middle men and importers. One of the daftest ideas I heard was from a senior police officer who thought it should be legalised to help with the crime figures, as if statistics drove the whole show.
I'm on an opinion forum not a medical science journal. Show me the evidence against and I'll review it and if necessary withdraw my comment. But to suggest there is no evidence that strongly confirms a relationship between the two is dangerous and /or thread extending.Where there is this evidence
Surprised and not surprised at the pro canabis lobby, younger generation seem to be taking drugs more than any generation before. The idea that all weed would be legalised is crazy, there's strong evidence that stronger stuff causes schizprhenia. The importers/dealers would make the illicit stuff more attractive, and crime levels would be maintained. I know the libertarian right wing thinks its a mater of personal choice, but far from legalising it, I would treat end users as criminals on the same basis as the middle men and importers. One of the daftest ideas I heard was from a senior police officer who thought it should be legalised to help with the crime figures, as if statistics drove the whole show.
You made the claim. The responsibility is on you to present that evidence, or admit that you're too lazy to look for it, it or doesn't exist.I'm on an opinion forum not a medical science journal. Show me the evidence against and I'll review it and if necessary withdraw my comment. But to suggest there is no evidence that strongly confirms a relationship between the two is dangerous and /or thread extending.
Knives, guns, rifles etc are already heavily controlled and licensed.
It doesn't look like it to me.No, that's conflating things
It doesn't look like it to me.
The argument that because something can't be eradicated, it should legalised is flawed.
Paedophilia will never be eradicated, therefor according your argument, it should be legalised.
Murder will never be eradicated, therfore legalise it and the crime of murder will disappear.
stronger stuff causes schizprhenia.
It funded organised crime ?Where do you stand on the US alcohol prohibition, which funded organised crime?