Makes My Blood Boil

The problem is definetly the benefit system I mean lets be honest i know its morally wrong what they are doing but the thing is now adays its more worthwhile to sit on ya ass at home doing nothing than go to work because when your at home with no job and you have kids you get your rent and council tax fully paid plus you get benefits to live on where if you get a job on minimum wage you have to pay your rent, council tax etc and once youve paid it all out youve got no money left. So who in the right mind is gonna go to work for **** all when they can sit at home and get the same amount of money. Im not condoning what they are doing its completly wrong i think you should get benefits for upto 2 children but then if you choose to have any more children then you dont get no more money then people wouldnt breed like rabbits for a children/ money tariff and at least one of the parents should have to get a job thats one thing i like about what labour are on about brining out where after 6 months a doley has to get a job otherwise ther benefits stop.
 
Sponsored Links
What could be worrying is that the children go the same way as the parents. Then and if they have 14 of them, they might turn out just like their parents - spongers.
In these circumstances, why is it that these people aren't given psychiatric counselling to determine the reasons for their need to procreate to such large numbers. Tiger woods went into rehab for wanting to sh ag a lot. It's a recognised illness - OCD

All of this is of course quite separate from the hugely disproportionate use of the world's resources to continue to maintain and enlarge what may be a genetically abnormal line.
 
...then take the kids away. Done.
OK. Two questions then after doing this:
1/. What do you do about the adults who presumably will want to cotinue to procreate?

2/. These children- who is going to pay for their upkeep now? Care homes, foster parents or what? (These are more costly financially to maintain than the current arrangement)

1)why would people want to procreate if they are going to be taken away?
2) Adoption. Using part of the money saved on benefits to reward people for bringing up these kids.

As I said, all it would take was a generation to have this message sink in.

We don't pay people to breed.
 
Surely we can kit out some old factory with beds and have them live there with state appointed canteens to feed them..I know it won't be pretty but I bet within one generation they would be so despised that no-one would breed unless they could support themselves.

:LOL: :LOL: :LOL: I'll take that bet........
As I've said before.........It can be a very lucrative proposition for some of these people.
Lack of basic education and bad parenting is the root of the problem.

Forced deprivation would be putting thousands of these people together.... :eek: .. There would be chaos.... It would be an ASBO ORGY on a scale never seen before.
 
Sponsored Links
skitz -
1) Take these adulta back to zero kids. He gets a job, and they start a family once more. After a few, they're back in the same trap as before and away we go again. These people are mentally disturbed (sociopathic in their selfishness" - do you honestly think that taking these kids away will stop them?

2) Adoption - this makes a whole load of assumptions. One of which is that the children will ot rebel ayway and end up costing us more (in a variety of ways). Maybe, or maybe not. Who knows?
 
they already have similar places to these factories your on about there called council estates lol!!!
 
Surely we can kit out some old factory with beds and have them live there with state appointed canteens to feed them..I know it won't be pretty but I bet within one generation they would be so despised that no-one would breed unless they could support themselves.

:LOL: :LOL: :LOL: I'll take that bet........
As I've said before.........It can be a very lucrative proposition for some of these people.
Lack of basic education and bad parenting is the root of the problem.

Forced deprivation would be putting thousands of these people together.... :eek: .. There would be chaos.... It would be an ASBO ORGY on a scale never seen before.

Then we lock the doors and let them have at it.
 
What could be worrying is that the children go the same way as the parents. Then and if they have 14 of them, they might turn out just like their parents - spongers.
In these circumstances, why is it that these people aren't given psychiatric counselling to determine the reasons for their need to procreate to such large numbers. Tiger woods went into rehab for wanting to sh ag a lot. It's a recognised illness - OCD

All of this is of course quite separate from the hugely disproportionate use of the world's resources to continue to maintain and enlarge what may be a genetically abnormal line.

Tiger Woods can afford to go into rehab - if these morons were to get help AGAIN, we, the tax payer, would have to pay out.
It must be an abnormal line - first off, her Jack and Danny needs closing, second, he has got to stop drinking so much, surely he must have been blotto to s**g that ugly bint.
 
skitz -
1) Take these adulta back to zero kids. He gets a job, and they start a family once more. After a few, they're back in the same trap as before and away we go again. These people are mentally disturbed (sociopathic in their selfishness" - do you honestly think that taking these kids away will stop them?

2) Adoption - this makes a whole load of assumptions. One of which is that the children will ot rebel ayway and end up costing us more (in a variety of ways). Maybe, or maybe not. Who knows?

1) Some are, but i'd say most are of the "I make more money NOT working"..they aren't stupid, they're scum. Make it less attractive and maybe they will use something when they want to bang their greasy haired spouse.

2) Well we have a 90% chance that if they stay with their scum bag parents they will just carry on the same crap...not much to lose.
 
[quote="skitzee2k";p="1579848

Then we lock the doors and let them have at it.[/quote]

as i said. bonkers
 
1) Some are, but i'd say most are of the "I make more money NOT working"..they aren't stupid, they're scum. Make it less attractive and maybe they will use something when they want to bang their greasy haired spouse.

2) Well we have a 90% chance that if they stay with their scum bag parents they will just carry on the same crap...not much to lose.
Quite emotive here skitz. Think I'll let you have the last word on the issue then.
 
1) Some are, but i'd say most are of the "I make more money NOT working"..they aren't stupid, they're scum. Make it less attractive and maybe they will use something when they want to bang their greasy haired spouse.

2) Well we have a 90% chance that if they stay with their scum bag parents they will just carry on the same crap...not much to lose.
Quite emotive here skitz. Think I'll let you have the last word on the issue then.

I'm quite suprised that Skitz with his idealistic ways actually supports the majority - so yes, let's let him have the last word :cool:
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top