S
sodthisforfun
Thanks Ian, top man!
So far on this thread you've accused Trans of the story being untrue.So it was gasbag that was the pillock that was fined for carrying industrial waste in his van without a licence? And you believed every word he told you, so did eeyore, and mightygob?
Why is it that some people need to be spoon fed otherwise they behave like a toddler, kicking, screaming until they get what they want?There is evidence out there but you are unable to provide it?
I read the article. You reckon there are other articles out there (somewhere), but you will not say where?
Why do these sources for their information have to be dragged, kicking and screaming, out of some people?
Source of these other reports, please.
Otherwise I can only go by the provided source
I disagree. If someone claims there are other sources out there, it is up to them to provide at least one other source.That is incorrect.
If you think the source is poor, its up to you to do your own homework.
https://metro.co.uk/2018/08/02/roof...ets-van-doesnt-licence-carry-rubbish-7789816/When he did find out his appeal was declined, he claims he asked for clarification on the cost of the fine but was on holiday when the local authority replied. Stewart could be prosecuted for failing to pay the penalty on time, but says he has no plans to settle the fine.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/20...carrying-sandwich-wrappers-crisp-packets-van/He was ordered to pay £300 within 14 days of May 23, when the incident occurred. He said he plans to settle the fine.
A**e end's version was not true:So far on this thread you've accused Trans of the story being untrue.
Jobs worths stopping commercial vans looking to fine some one for a sandwich wrapper left in there van or an empty coke can
Typical a**e end tactic. Take a little pinch of truth and wrap it around with a fantasy to suit your own narrative.
I disagree. If someone claims there are other sources out there, it is up to them to provide at least one other source.
A**e end's version was not true
I suggest you take a calm pill, you are getting yourself into a tizzy again
No.
If you are the one saying the validity of the source is in doubt because it was a tabloid newspaper, you need to back up your evidence.
Sensationalised yes, but enough semblance of truth to not be fake news.The story did not fully support the headline
Sensationalised yes, but enough semblance of truth to not be fake news.
I didnt say it was fully true.
No.
If you are the one saying the validity of the source is in doubt because it was a tabloid newspaper, you need to back up your evidence.
It is true, you have even linked the sources that say so.
Ha ha, you are the one grizzling because once again youve tried proving Transam wrong and youve been found wanting
The whole story is untrue,Sensationalised yes, but enough semblance of truth to not be fake news.
I didnt say it was fully true.
It is a total pack of lies by the culprit
A Waltham Forest Council spokesman said: "The waste in this case was being transported in commercial refuse bag in the trader's vehicle.
"Regardless of what the items are, if waste is being stored in a commercial refuse bag in a trader's van it is necessary that they have a valid waste carriers' licence.
"It is widely recognised as best practice for tradesmen to be licensed to avoid legal repercussions, in the event they are required to transport even small quantities of waste.
No it's not. Besides, I did put up other links, already pointed out to you by Ian.I disagree. If someone claims there are other sources out there, it is up to them to provide at least one other source.
And yet I knew exactly what story Trans was referring to so he can't be all that bad in his recollection. It was all over the press a few days ago, I daresay a lot of people heard about it. Had you had a quick google yourself, instead of disbelieving him, calling him names you'd not have made this whole thing into yet another song and dance.A**e end's version was not true: