Look there's some squirrels.How are you getting on with understanding the grounds for appeal?
and the grounds for compensation?
and this?
are all boll@x.
It's up to the judge, it's not about time either. Some criminal cases are fairly short. 11 in the minimum to proceed. But if things had only just got going the Judge would dismiss the Jury and schedule a new trial with a new panel. In general, they prefer to continue, due to the costs.So, a trial starts with 12.
At what point can a trial proceed with 11, should a juror have to be excused?
An hour in?
A day in?
Once a certain procedural step has been passed?
This is the only pertinent discussion.It would depend on the length of, complexity of, and how much the case had already progressed through that process.
are all boll@x.
A trial starts with twelve jurors
A jury trial will always start with twelve jurors. The trial can’t start with fewer jurors.
There are many reasons, however, leading to a trial not always finishing with twelve. Jurors may become sick and be unable to return. In some rare cases they may be removed from a jury due to some misconduct during the trial. As long as the number of jurors does not fall below nine then a lawful verdict can be reached.
See my post #104 and 109, which you claimed "are all boll@x."It's up to the judge, it's not about time either. Some criminal cases are fairly short. 11 in the minimum to proceed. But if things had only just got going the Judge would dismiss the Jury and schedule a new trial with a new panel. In general, they prefer to continue, due to the costs.
are they also talking boll@x?Look there's some squirrels.
well you had a 50% chance.. better luck next time.Disagree.
Was there only one trial? One jury?well you had a 50% chance.. better luck next time.
Squirrels don't talk.are they also talking boll@x?
Luck is not needed to report reality.well you had a 50% chance.. better luck next time.
Only a few people believe the misinformation of only 11 people being on the jury..well you had a 50% chance.. better luck next time.
it's not about time either
Twelve to start surely, and as low as 3 to finish because then there cant be a hung jury. Nothing in wiki about it so must be fudges decision.It's up to the judge, it's not about time either. Some criminal cases are fairly short. 11 in the minimum to proceed. But if things had only just got going the Judge would dismiss the Jury and schedule a new trial with a new panel. In general, they prefer to continue, due to the costs.
Most people think it’s irrelevant.Only a few people believe the misinformation of only 11 people being on the jury..
Filly and you, everybody else wants the facts, not the fillyfacts
Let's try again for the hard of understanding.Moving on..
We have
Most people think it’s irrelevant.
A few forum idiots think it wasn’t 11.
11 in the minimum otherwise you have a miss trialTwelve to start surely, and as low as 3 to finish because then there cant be a hung jury. Nothing in wiki about it so must be fudges decision.