Re-termed but still actually discriminates in favour of ethic minorities for the greater good. That's the point being made to you, over and over again.
There really is something wrong with your logic.
Discrimination against a whole ethnicity, simply because they are different or "the majority" is pure discrimination. Something that you cannot accuse me of. It is the same as racism, or prejudice, i.e. a belief in one ethnicity being superior to another. And it is illegal!
Positive Action, on the other hand, is about improving the disadvantaged in any society and in specific circumstances, not just simply throughout society. That would be discrimination. Postive Action is something that I mistakenly continued to describe as Positive Discrimination, when BT mentioned it and something that I had previously accurately described as Positive Action. I knew what I meant, but I mistakenly continued to use another's terminology. I recognised my mistake and corrected it. Something which you consistently refuse to do and continue with the broken record technique. That technique is useful when you're right but embarrassing when you're wrong.
But I can't really expect you to accept or recognise that because you simply can't differentiate between one or the other. You're just blindly continuing with the same old false accusation over and over and over again.
Interesting also that you only dropped your support of discrimination when you found out the EHRC dropped it, otherwise you'd still be saying it was fine.
Precisely, because the EHRC is better terminology and allows for the wholesale denouncement of discrimination in any form. I repeat:
I recognised my mistake way back on Page 13 and corrected it.
That is, it's fine for you when it's whites that are the ones being discriminated against.
Now you've gone from being extremely annoying for repeating
ad nauseam the same fallacious argument, to an absurd accusation. You're very fortunate that this is an anonymous social media site otherwise I would be pursuing a libel action.
Because it is an anonymous social media site, you are free to accuse anyone of anything, but it doesn't give you any more integrity, nor make your arguments any more accurate.
You can accuse me of anything, but I'm bored with your baseless accusations over and over and over again.
Maybe a clearer summary of your opinion is that you support the reduction of white peoples' power in this country, whether that is achieved by discrimination against them or by other means, and not simply that you are against discrimination towards anyone, as you have claimed but we have proved to be untrue now.
You can’t find a reasonable argument for yourself without endless repetitions of same old, same old, so if I want a clear summary of my opinion, I’ll do it myself, thank you. You've just tried and made an absurd mess of it.
The zealous nature of your arguments against ethnic discrimination has only made your approval of white discrimination stand out even more to show what you are - a hypocrite.
I suggest you read that back to yourself, see if you understand it. Your first phrase mentions my zealous nature against discrimination, followed by your phrase of my approval of discrimination. Make up your mind. You've gone round in so many circles you don't know which way you're going youself.
Since you like quotes, there is one I read that unfortunately I can't find the source for but it goes something like this "You can tell the measure of a man's intellect by observing how diverse his opinion is on the same subject, when the question is framed in a different way"
Probably ‘cos you just made it up.
Never mind, here’s a real quote:
You cannot teach a man anything, you can only help him to find it within himself. Galileo
I can't teach you anything, but sadly you can't find it yourself.