reproduction rates

[Slogger]

france is being too soft on these scum how about snipers every 10 meters if your a law breaker and an illegal your dead

way too soft same as we would be and i say we meaning our police as they would have had there hands tied me on the other hand have both hands untied and rdy to do the christian thing and that is to rid our shores of any islamic followers

make this religion illegal /close the immigration door / we will be better off financially / morally/ and best of all we will be safer

 

[WoodYouLike]

Already, today, as we speak, 1 in 50 of our population is an illegal alien. A new underclass just like the one currently rioting in France.

You didn't watch the news yesterday then, did you? The rioting 'illegal underclass' as you call them are mostly legal people (non-French origin, mostly originating from former French colonies) blaming the French government for discrimination.

 

[WoodYouLike]

Blimey Woodo I thought rant meant To speak or write in an angry or violent manner, rave . Live and learn !

Sure Pip, but Rant Over means.....

 

[joe-90]

It matters not where an underclass come from, what matters is that they are there. Why do you want the UK to have a large problematic underclass? What is it that you are actually arguing for?



joe

 

[Nige F]

Rant over?

Why are you trying to prevent someone having a say? You have your chance don't you?

Did you know that within 50 years the white American will be a minority race is his own country?

Could it happen here? What do you think?


joe

HIS own country.Kimosabe

 

[WoodYouLike]

IWhat is it that you are actually arguing for?

Fair question, seems you've lost the plot of the post and are arguing for arguings sake. Do you ever stop to think that people CAN have another opinion than you have and neither could be right?

 

[big-all]

Rant over?

Why are you trying to prevent someone having a say? You have your chance don't you?

Did you know that within 50 years the white American will be a minority race is his own country?

Could it happen here? What do you think?


joe

i take it you mean the white immigrants and not the native americans!!!!

 

[joe-90]

IWhat is it that you are actually arguing for?

Fair question, seems you've lost the plot of the post and are arguing for arguings sake. Do you ever stop to think that people CAN have another opinion than you have and neither could be right?

The difference is that I can answer any question you ask of me. My beliefs live in the real world - not in some fanciful notion that the world is a fair place.

 

[WoodYouLike]

Problem is, I don't need to ask you questions, I know your answers before

 

[joe-90]

Problem is, I don't need to ask you questions, I know your answers before

Precognition? You've just proven the laws of science wrong. Well done - you've changed the world. Who's gonna win the 3pm at Aintree?

 

[WoodYouLike]

 

[joe-90]

Can we just sort something out?

There is a well known saying in politics "We are where we are".

What that means is that if the Tories get in next time they won't dismantle everything that they opposed in opposition. Could you imagine it? Every time there was an election everything instituted by the party leaving would be unwound and turned back to as it was before they gained power?

Now you people that keep blathering on about the indigenous population of America, Australia, New Zealand etc have to face a simple choice.

Either we are were we are and we argue from that viewpoint - or you put your money where your mouth is and suggest that all the white residents of those countries leave the country and return to the lands of their fore-fathers. I mean, come on guys, you are simply talking rubbish and you know it.

We are where we are. Let's forget trying to bring lame aruments from history into the equation - unless you will state here and now that you are in favour of mass repatriation over settlements that have taken place over four centuries.

Come on. Let's see you nail your colours to the mast.


joe

 

[WoodYouLike]

You're all over the place Joe. Switching from one item to another, can't make head or tails of it.
The original tread has long since gone out of the equation, you're grabbing left, right and center.

We are where we are means that one political party wont change anything another political party has brought into legislation. Then somehow because some of us refer to history we want to send the former immigrants of the old colonies back to where they come from (mainly Western Europe) to put our money where our mouth is.

My colour is maroon

 

[joe-90]

Sorry you don't understand. I can't make it any easier. It's s simple concept - either you deal with things from WHERE WE ARE NOW. Or you change everthing that's happened over the past four centuries because we have to follow the precedents of history. I'm saying that ancient history doesn't even come into the argument - "we are where we are". That is our only point of reference.



joe

 

[WoodYouLike]

Ah, now I see the problem. We are WHERE we are NOW because of what happened in the past, you can't ignore that at your leisure and blame everything that is happening here and now to some group or groups of people who are HERE also because of that.
I'm not saying because of history everything should be accepted, I'm saying you have to look at the bigger overall picture to see where we came from and where we are going. History has a funny way of repeating itself over and over again. Riots against Vikings, riots against the Spanish, riots against the Kelts, even riots against the protestants and then the catholics, riots against the white immigrants in the America's (both North and south) in the far-east and down-under, riots against dictators. Nothing new under the old sun.