Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Draft Bill

[gant]

Very few Mr Daily Mail

Oh do tell what are the figures your privileged to.

 

[Notch7]

You could always stop them at source but that would not be playing by the rules and the EU abide by rules don't they.
https://www.theguardian.com/comment...lock-up-migrants-britain-wants-to-follow-suit

That article isn’t correct, the EU don’t pay Libyan militia.

they actually pay the Libyan coastguard and other aid agencies

but it’s true Frontex effectively collaborate in the Libyan system

Europe’s border agency under fire for aiding Libya's brutal migrant detentions

The E.U. pays for almost every aspect of Libya's often lethal migrant detention system, an investigation found, including the boats that fire on migrant rafts.

www.nbcnews.com

 

[Notch7]

Oh do tell what are the figures you’re privileged to.

you seem to think they aren’t genuine refugees.

where are your figures



most of them come from countries of persecution or war….certainly the ones that come to the U.K. are

 

[Odds]

So they pay the Libyan coastguard but the coastguard are not forced to give money to militias. Riiiiight.

 

[gant]

you seem to think they aren’t genuine refugees.

where are your figures



most of them come from countries of persecution or war….certainly the ones that come to the U.K. are

Don't beat about the bush you made the claim about there being very few.
I can appreciate you might not have the figures for those who do a runner when they beach here.

 

[motorbiking]

Since the law changed this year 100% will have their claims rejected. Apparently.

 

[gant]

So they pay the Libyan coastguard but the coastguard are not forced to give money to militias. Riiiiight.

Greeness round the gills is something notchy seems to have more than his fair share.

 

[Notch7]

So they pay the Libyan coastguard but the coastguard are not forced to give money to militias. Riiiiight.

The article says:

“The EU pays Africa’s brutal militias to lock up migrants”

but that is not true.

What the EU are doing is wrong, but they are not directly paying militia


You should read the article I linked instead of trying trying to score points against me because you are still smarting from having your unproven opinions of “EU federalism”.

 

[Notch7]

Since the law changed this year 100% will have their claims rejected. Apparently.

due to a law which is not legal

 

[motorbiking]

How can we have laws that are not legal?

 

[gant]

No figures then, usual notchy shout down not based on facts.

 

[Odds]

The article says:

“The EU pays Africa’s brutal militias to lock up migrants”

but that is not true.

What the EU are doing is wrong, but they are not directly paying militia


You should read the article I linked instead of trying trying to score points against me because you are still smarting from having your unproven opinions of “EU federalism”.

forgotten all about that - but it's obvious you did not read the link i provided to Guy Verhofstedt's comments in the article.
Wind yer neck in Notch. You're starting to sound like Bloomers on a bad hair day.

 

[Notch7]

How can we have laws that are not legal?

Conservative govt, it does things which are illegal, like proroguing parliament,


the law is based on processing asylum claims in a 3rd country
the Supreme Court have ruled that the only govt scheme set up with Rwanda is not legal.
ergo the illegal migrant law is illegal.



If you think thats not true, please tell me where those arriving by small boat which are prevented from claiming asylum are going……

 

[motorbiking]

In order
1. irrelevant
2. no its isn't
3. nothing to do with the new laws on inadmissibility of claim
4. nonsense

5 a very good question, my guess is they are detained pending removal.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

Since the law changed this year 100% will have their claims rejected. Apparently.

So all are being returned or sent elsewhere?

No problem then