There is a problem with hospitals and military. One side may use them as a shield on the basis that the other side will be criticised if they attack. Then comes some one attacking one and say there were military there etc when there wasn't.
Thee is another aspect as well. Rather hard to miss. It wasn't the hospital that was bombed. It was the square outside leaving a pit at least 20ft deep. If that had hit the hospital it would have destroyed and entire block. If full of people a lot more would be killed. Instead of that blast damage, 17 injured and 3 dead. This even suggests there were few people in the rooms as rather a lot of windows.
blast damage seems to figure a lot in Russia's technique plus some blast stuff to bits but not much. It's why for this sort of thing casualties seem to be low. So far anyway. Attack types seem to relate to either night when there is a curfew or during the day when people are in basements. Given a siren they will be sheltering. There may be some feints that cause those to go off but some of them need to leave visual results otherwise people would disregard the sirens. War is nasty full stop and civilians will suffer.
Personally not sure what gives in regard to tanks. They are often regarded on the ability to take out other tanks -
During the Korean War, the USA captured a T-34-85. US engineering analysis and testing concluded that the T-34-85 could penetrate 4.1 in (100 mm) at 1,000 yd (910 m), performing similarly to the HVAP rounds of the M41. The Americans also concluded the maximum range of the gun was 2–3 km (1.2–1.9 mi), but the effective range was only up to 1,900 m (1.2 mi)
Suppose it depends what type of shells they fire. The T34 came as a bit of shock to Germany in WWII. One aspect was better ability to operate on Russian soil in it's various conditions. The other problem was antitank gun shells of the time initially mostly just bouncing off them. It developed rapidly and cheap.
Thee is another aspect as well. Rather hard to miss. It wasn't the hospital that was bombed. It was the square outside leaving a pit at least 20ft deep. If that had hit the hospital it would have destroyed and entire block. If full of people a lot more would be killed. Instead of that blast damage, 17 injured and 3 dead. This even suggests there were few people in the rooms as rather a lot of windows.
blast damage seems to figure a lot in Russia's technique plus some blast stuff to bits but not much. It's why for this sort of thing casualties seem to be low. So far anyway. Attack types seem to relate to either night when there is a curfew or during the day when people are in basements. Given a siren they will be sheltering. There may be some feints that cause those to go off but some of them need to leave visual results otherwise people would disregard the sirens. War is nasty full stop and civilians will suffer.Personally not sure what gives in regard to tanks. They are often regarded on the ability to take out other tanks -
During the Korean War, the USA captured a T-34-85. US engineering analysis and testing concluded that the T-34-85 could penetrate 4.1 in (100 mm) at 1,000 yd (910 m), performing similarly to the HVAP rounds of the M41. The Americans also concluded the maximum range of the gun was 2–3 km (1.2–1.9 mi), but the effective range was only up to 1,900 m (1.2 mi)
Suppose it depends what type of shells they fire. The T34 came as a bit of shock to Germany in WWII. One aspect was better ability to operate on Russian soil in it's various conditions. The other problem was antitank gun shells of the time initially mostly just bouncing off them. It developed rapidly and cheap.
