The death penalty.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm pleased that the message has finally got through about my moral superiority.
Feeling "morally superior" is more important to you than anything else, so carry on. Other people are more interested in having a proper system of justice and deterrant in place, and if hard decisions have to be taken to implement it, would not be frightened to take them.
 
Sponsored Links
Heil Hitler
What an odd thing to say.

All along I've been telling you that I am morally superior because I don't want to kill, and then when I acknowledge that you've finally admitted it you write that...

Get rid off the do gooders and bleedin hearts and Hang the scum
No - let's get rid of the scum who want state-sanctioned killing as a means of punishment and control.

Hang the scum they won't.!!!!!
If we get rid of the scum who want state-sanctioned killing as a means of punishment and control then that will be one step towards a more civilised society.

No !!! you only need the hang the scum once
If we get rid of the scum who want state-sanctioned killing as a means of punishment and control then that will be one step towards a more civilised society.

They'll be dead which is good.
If we get rid of the scum who revel in state-sanctioned killing as a means of punishment and control then that will be one step towards a more civilised society.


Sowhy do we have prisons at all, according to you we just as well give Our kids to the butchers now
Have I suggested getting rid of prisons? Or have I suggested using them in a way which has better people coming out than go in?

I guess the problem here is that the sort of scum who want state-sanctioned killing as a means of punishment and control don't want prison to work, as that wouldn't satisfy their primitive killing urge.
 
Why would want to treat and stop them re-offending ???

or Doesn't life without parole mean that to the bleedin hearts and brain dead

Whats it gonna be BAS Life without parole, no need to waste time or money on them, 8ft cage and throw the key away.

Or Hang the Scum and save the space
Why don't we get rid of the scum who want state-sanctioned killing as a means of punishment and control?
 
So you can't answer BAS because you're blinkered and in the same mold as all do gooders and bleedin heart
 
Sponsored Links
Why would want to treat and stop them re-offending ???

or Doesn't life without parole mean that to the bleedin hearts and brain dead

Whats it gonna be BAS Life without parole, no need to waste time or money on them, 8ft cage and throw the key away.

Or Hang the Scum and save the space
Why don't we get rid of the scum who want state-sanctioned killing as a means of punishment and control?

Answers to tricky BAS
 
Feeling "morally superior" is more important to you than anything else, so carry on.
It's not "more important" as in something I strive to achieve at the expense of something else.

It is a simple fact that I am your moral superior, a fact which you repeatedly demonstrate here.

Other people are more interested in having a vengeful and sadistic system of justice and deterrant in place, even though it doesn't work, and even though it demeans society, because it satisfies their sadistic urges.
 
Oh look - yet again DIYnot demonstrates how they think it's unacceptable to call people nasty things, but it's perfectly OK to say you want to kill them.

Yeah, that's called "having a civilised debate" if everyone had the same opinions there would be no debate possible. You need to grow up.
And what sort of debate is it when DIYnot allows one person to express his opinions and denies that facility to another?
 
Ban-all-sheds said that
sooey wrote:
Other people are more interested in having a vengeful and sadistic system of justice and deterrant in place, even though it doesn't work, and even though it demeans society, because it satisfies their sadistic urges.

When you have to resort to outright LIES you've already lost the argument. Now go away, there's a good liar.
 
So you can't answer BAS because you're blinkered and in the same mold as all do gooders and bleedin heart
I've answered over and over again, but you still don't get it - it is a self-evident truth that state-sanctioned punishment killings are utterly unacceptable.
 
And what sort of debate is it when DIYnot allows one person to express his opinions and denies that facility to another?
Are you saying that you haven't been allowed to express your opinions now? Or is it that you can't express them without resorting to insults? Very morally superior :LOL: :LOL:
 
Ban-all-sheds said that
sooey wrote:
Other people are more interested in having a vengeful and sadistic system of justice and deterrant in place, even though it doesn't work, and even though it demeans society, because it satisfies their sadistic urges.

When you have to resort to outright LIES you've already lost the argument. Now go away, there's a good liar.
Lie?

Given its temporal and spacial proximity to the original I think most people would have the intelligence to see it as a frequently used device to highlight what someone actually meant by their words.
 
And what sort of debate is it when DIYnot allows one person to express his opinions and denies that facility to another?
Are you saying that you haven't been allowed to express your opinions now? Or is it that you can't express them without resorting to insults? Very morally superior :LOL: :LOL:

Insult (tr) to offend, affront. (n) an offensive remark

I'm saying that DIYnot permit your insults to remain.
 
Lie?

Given its temporal and spacial proximity to the original I think most people would have the intelligence to see it as a frequently used device to highlight what someone actually meant by their words.
__________________
Given it's verbal distance from the original, most people would have the intelligence to see it as a lie. You don't sell secondhand cars by any chance do you?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
Back
Top