The death penalty.

[sooey]

And what sort of debate is it when DIYnot allows one person to express his opinions and denies that facility to another?

Are you saying that you haven't been allowed to express your opinions now? Or is it that you can't express them without resorting to insults? Very morally superior

Insult (tr) to offend, affront. (n) an offensive remark

I'm saying that DIYnot permit your insults to remain.

So there we have it, other people are not allowed to express different opinions to yours, because it offends your sense of moral superiority, which you then see as a personal insult. As doitall said "Heil Hitler".

 

[doitall]

So you can't answer BAS because you're blinkered and in the same mold as all do gooders and bleedin heart

I've answered over and over again, but you still don't get it - it is a self-evident truth that state-sanctioned punishment killings are utterly unacceptable.

In Your opinion.

Where is it self evident, its 50/50 you and me at the moment, because I say it's time to start getting tough with the scumbags.

How about we let them loose on Salisbury plain and give Our boys some search and destroy practice

 

[ban-all-sheds]

Lie?

Given its temporal and spacial proximity to the original I think most people would have the intelligence to see it as a frequently used device to highlight what someone actually meant by their words.
__________________

Given it's verbal distance from the original, most people would have the intelligence to see it as a lie.

I genuinely didn't think that intelligent people would interpret what I wrote as an attempt to deceive them.

Whether I overestimated the intelligence of most people I can't say, but I apologise for overestimating yours.

 

[ban-all-sheds]

So there we have it, other people are not allowed to express different opinions to yours, because it offends your sense of moral superiority, which you then see as a personal insult. As doitall said "Heil Hitler".

I didn't say that they weren't allowed to express their opinions - I was highlighting the lack of balance on the part of DIYnot in that they allow your insults to be written here.

 

[ban-all-sheds]

In Your opinion.

No - it is a self-evident truth.

Where is it self evident,

Anywhere and everywhere.

its 50/50 you and me at the moment, because I say it's time to start getting tough with the scumbags.

And I say it's time to revile the scumbags who want state-sanctioned punishment killings.

 

[Shytalkz]

I didn't say that they weren't allowed to express their opinions - I was highlighting the lack of balance on the part of DIYnot in that they allow your insults to be written here.

Why not? They allowed all your insults to remain. Fair play and all that - anyhow, sticks and stones and if you get offended by a bit of verbal jousting, you really need to get out more .

 

[Shytalkz]

And I say it's time to revile the scumbags who want state-sanctioned punishment killings.

And that is not an insult?

 

[doitall]

I genuinely didn't think that intelligent people would interpret what I wrote as an attempt to deceive them.

I genuinely think with your holier than thou attitude most people don't give a monkey's what you think, or if its at all possible.

Whats wrong with setting them free on Salisbury plain..

Our boys could practice, search and destroy tactics, jungle, well woods warfare, the technicians and engineers could test all kinds of satellite surveillance, tanks, snippers, and foot solders would have a moving target to shoot at, pilots could practice pinpoint bombing, navy guys/gals can do the same with scud missiles, shuck the list is endless even ordinance and navigational skills could be practiced.

 

[ban-all-sheds]

Why not? They allowed all your insults to remain. Fair play and all that

That's just it - they don't.

anyhow, sticks and stones and if you get offended by a bit of verbal jousting, you really need to get out more .

Ah - sorry - can't help being offended by people who want to kill.

 

[ban-all-sheds]

its 50/50 you and me at the moment, because I say it's time to start getting tough with the scumbags.

And I say it's time to revile the scumbags who want state-sanctioned punishment killings.

And I say it's time to revile the scumbags who want state-sanctioned punishment killings.

And that is not an insult?

Why are you only asking me that question?

 

[Shytalkz]

Err, I think they did let them stay, ol' bean. Or are you confusing the mods with the auto-censor, which stops you from really saying what you'd like to call people?

It is your perogative to be offended of course, but don't go bandying on about you being insulted when, for the most part, you've been the one making the so-called insults. Be offended, that's fine and perfectly normal - but just because you are offended by someone's pov and opinion does not make them a scumbag, or morally inferior to you.

If, however, you were making such derogatory comments about ****** and chavs and other general worthless pondlife, then I would be in complete agreement with you .

 

[Shytalkz]

And I say it's time to revile the scumbags who want state-sanctioned punishment killings.

And that is not an insult?

Why are you only asking me that question?

Because you're the only one levelling that comment at people who would like to see the death peanlty reintroduced, funnily enough .

 

[sooey]

So there we have it, other people are not allowed to express different opinions to yours, because it offends your sense of moral superiority, which you then see as a personal insult. As doitall said "Heil Hitler".

I didn't say that they weren't allowed to express their opinions - I was highlighting the lack of balance on the part of DIYnot in that they allow your insults to be written here.

You have spent most of this thread tossing vile insults at, and even wishing death on people who dare to disagree with what you "know" is right.

Then you are a vile, disgusting, sub-human scumbag that is worth less than dog-**** on the sole of society's shoe, and the world would be a better place if you removed yourself from it.

 

[doitall]

Ah - sorry - can't help being offended by people who want to kill.

So you are offended by skum that rape and butcher little kids. You just don't want to hurt the poor darlings when they're caught

Typical do gooder, bleedin heart, human rights attitude that sent this Country into the depths of hell.

What is your cure for a group of men that blow a bus load of kids up, slap their wrists and tell them not to do it again perhaps ?

What dept do we own the kids that had their whole lives to look forward too ?

 

[Trazor]

And I say it's time to revile the scumbags who want state-sanctioned punishment killings.

Why are you all concerned about the fate of of few murderers, when this government already sanctions early death sentences on hundreds of cancer sufferers, for cost reasons.

New drugs are available, which are rationed on a cost/where you live policy.

Does this government revile you, ban-all-sheds, for its "state sanctioned innocent killings".