- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 17,156
- Reaction score
- 2,398
- Country
Yes.Delivering a known lethal dose?
Yes.Delivering a known lethal dose?
It was made very clear when we had to gather family round, and it was then a swift end. Call it what you like.So a morphine pump is unlikely to do the job of giving you a fatal dose.
Which is the inconsistency of Blup's position.Its illegal and nothing in the bill changes that
I suspect they were/are very experienced at predicting the final moments. Research shows that high doses of morphine at the end of life tend to prolong life.It was made very clear when we had to gather family round, and it was then a swift end. Call it what you like.
We all know it's illegal. maybe some hospice workers are cavalier with language, but they risk prison if they give fatal doses of drugs.Which is the inconsistency of Blup's position.
With respect, you have no idea of the final moments we went through. It was clear what went on, and I have no complaints.I suspect they were/are very experienced at predicting the final moments.
And if society chooses that, then so be it.Once it becomes legal, there is a risk of normalisation.
You haven't been there at the end I guessIts illegal and nothing in the bill changes that. But I understood that 250mg is lethal in one go, but 600mg wont necessarily kill you if administered throughout the day. So a morphine pump is unlikely to do the job of giving you a fatal dose.
And the 2 doctors agree ?I have no problem with that. But I can acknowledge the point of view that it can end up with...
"come on Granny its better for everyone, this care home is costing us £100k a year out of our inheritance."
I have no doubt that there will be a few people thinking that way...I have no problem with that. But I can acknowledge the point of view that it can end up with...
"come on Granny its better for everyone, this care home is costing us £100k a year out of our inheritance."
It informs the argument but doesn't flatten it. There will be even more lawyers and doctors poring over the legal and medical question whether someone has mental capacity in this kind of case....which kinda flattens your argument, such as it is.
you'll be teaching your granny to suck eggs soon enough.
Not if the person makes that CHOICE before they are at that stage.It informs the argument but doesn't flatten it. There will be even more lawyers and doctors poring over the legal and medical question whether someone has mental capacity in this kind of case.
What is wrong with having a choice ?